Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381343›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2024

Women's experiences with the post-placental intrauterine device: a qualitative study.

Ana Beatriz Venturin, Debora Bicudo Faria-Schützer, Odette Del Risco Sánchez, Larissa Rodrigues, Thuany Bento Herculano, Fernanda Garanhani Surita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Beatriz VenturinUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology CampinasSP Brazil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0482-2728
Debora Bicudo Faria-SchützerUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology CampinasSP Brazil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7918-6714
Odette Del Risco SánchezUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology CampinasSP Brazil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7094-0378
Larissa RodriguesUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology CampinasSP Brazil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8714-7010
Thuany Bento HerculanoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology CampinasSP Brazil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9218-9415
Fernanda Garanhani SuritaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology CampinasSP Brazil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4335-0337

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore women's experiences with postpartum intrauterine device (PPIUD) insertion and the decision-making process in the postpartum period. Methods: A qualitative design was employed with face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured script of open questions. The sample was intentionally selected using the concept of theoretical information saturation. Results: Interviews were conducted (1) in the immediate postpartum period, and (2) in the postpartum appointment. 25 women (N = 25) over 18 years old who had a birth followed by PPIUD insertion were interviewed between October 2021 and June 2022. Three categories were constructed: (1) Choice process, (2) Relationship with the health team at the time of birth and the postpartum period, and (3) To know or not to know about contraception, that is the question. Conclusion: Professionals' communication management, popular knowledge, advantages of the PPIUD and the moment PPIUD is offered play a fundamental role in the construction of knowledge about the IUD. Choice process did not end in the insertion.

Indexed as

Intrauterine DevicesPostpartum PeriodQualitative ResearchAdultDecision MakingFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyYoung AdultIntrauterine devicesLong-acting reversible contraceptionPostpartum periodReproductive health

Identifiers

PMID39381343
PMCPMC11460429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.