Review in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Henri Augusto KorkesPontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology São PauloSP Brazil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5345-3861
Ricardo Carvalho CavalliUniversidade de São Paulo Faculty of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5010-4914
Leandro Gustavo De OliveiraUniversidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" Botucatu Medical School Department of Gynecology and Obstetric BotucatuSP Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetric, Botucatu Medical School, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8422-9907
José Geraldo Lopes RamosUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Faculty of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Porto AlegreRS Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3789-885X
Sérgio Hofmeister de Almeida Martins CostaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Faculty of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Porto AlegreRS Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0565-9747
Francisco Lázaro Pereira de SousaCentro Universitário Lusíada Department of Tocoginecology SantosSP Brazil Department of Tocoginecology, Centro Universitário Lusíada, Santos, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1524-3350
Maria Rita de Souza MesquitaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo Paulista School of Medicine São PauloSP Brazil Paulista School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5018-4154
Mário Dias CorrêaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais Faculty of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Belo HorizonteMG Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-0546
Ana Cristina Pinheiro Fernandes AraújoUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Maternidade Januário Cicco Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics NatalRN Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Maternidade Januário Cicco, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9802-6492
Alberto Carlos Moreno ZaconetaUniversidade de Brasília Faculty of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics BrasíliaDF Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6440-4395
Carlos Henrique Esteves FreireUniversidade Federal do Amazonas Faculdade de Medicina Departamento de Saude Materno Infantil ManausAM Brazil Departamento de Saude Materno Infantil, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0511-1709
Carlos Eduardo Poli de FigueiredoPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Departament of Nephrology and Internal Medicine Porto AlegreRS Brazil Departament of Nephrology and Internal Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7333-8884
Edilberto Alves Pereira da RochaUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco RecifePE Brazil Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6434-2654
Nelson SassUniversidade Federal de São Paulo Paulista School of Medicine São PauloSP Brazil Paulista School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7187-1004
José Carlos PeraçoliUniversidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" Botucatu Medical School Department of Gynecology and Obstetric BotucatuSP Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetric, Botucatu Medical School, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3273-3001
Maria Laura CostaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology CampinasSP Brazil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8280-3234
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
In low and middle-income countries such as Brazil, most maternal deaths are related to hypertensive complications. Preeclampsia is the leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. Significant proportion is associated with the following factors: lack of identification of high-risk women, lack of adequate prevention, difficulty in maintaining a high-risk prenatal follow-up, delayed diagnosis, insecurity and low use of magnesium sulphate, delayed pregnancy interruption and lack of postpartum follow-up of these high-risk cases. Four major actions are proposed to minimize this alarming clinical picture and reduce the mortality rates due to preeclampsia, called the "4 P Rule" (Adequate Prevention - Vigilant Prenatal Care - Timely Delivery (Parturition) - Safe Postpartum). From this simple "rule" we can open a range of important processes and reminders that may help in the guidance of preeclampsia management.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
How can we reduce maternal mortality due to preeclampsia? The 4P rule. · full record | OpenQuestion