Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381336›Full record

SynthesisRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2024

Prevalence of syphilis and associated factors among pregnant women in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Iana Mundim de Oliveira, Regilane Cordeiro Dos Santos, Renan Alves Silva, Rosane Ribeiro Figueiredo Alves, Bruno César Teodoro Martins, Leonardo Ribeiro Soares

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trend in the detection rate of syphilis among older adults: time series analysis, Brazil, 2014-2023.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iana Mundim de OliveiraUniversidade Federal de Goiás GoiâniaGO Brazil Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7005-7497
Regilane Cordeiro Dos SantosUniversidade Federal de Goiás GoiâniaGO Brazil Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2334-2305
Renan Alves SilvaUniversidade Federal de Campina Grande CajazeirasPB Brazil Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Cajazeiras, PB, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6354-2785
Rosane Ribeiro Figueiredo AlvesUniversidade Federal de Goiás GoiâniaGO Brazil Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3960-6662
Bruno César Teodoro MartinsUniversidade Federal de Goiás GoiâniaGO Brazil Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2759-6003
Leonardo Ribeiro SoaresUniversidade Federal de Goiás GoiâniaGO Brazil Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9448-6114

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review accompanied by a meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of syphilis in pregnant women in Brazil and describe its associated factors. Methods: Following the establishment the search strategies and the registration of the review protocol in PROSPERO, we conducted a search for relevant articles in the Pubmed, LILACS, Science Direct, SciELO and Web of Science databases. Our inclusion criteria were cross-sectional studies published between 2005 and 2023, with no language restrictions. The combined prevalence of syphilis infection was estimated using the random effects model in the R Software with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and p < 0.01 as statistically significant. Results: A total of 24 articles were recruited, which together investigated 221,884 women. The combined prevalence of syphilis in pregnant women in Brazil was 1.79% (95% CI: 1.24-2.57%), and the main factors associated with its occurrence were black and brown skin color, low education and factors related to the partner. Conclusion: There was a high prevalence of syphilis in pregnancy in Brazil, mainly associated with socioeconomic factors.

Indexed as

Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousSyphilisBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyPrevalenceRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsBrazilinfectiousPregnancyPregnancy complicationsPregnant womenPrevalenceSyphilis

Identifiers

PMID39381336
PMCPMC11460426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.