Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381327›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2024

Resection of a giant right coronary artery aneurysm and reconstruction with a saphenous vein graft: a 20-year follow-up-case report.

Joshua Halyckyj-Smith, David Rose

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joshua Halyckyj-SmithUniversity of Manchester, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals Trust, Sharoe Green Ln, Fulwood, Preston PR2 9HT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-0787
David RoseLancashire Cardiac Centre, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Whinney Heys Rd, Blackpool FY3 8NP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) are uncommon and can cause complications such as thrombosis, vessel rupture, or distal embolization. Rarely, CAAs are classified as 'giant', although the defining diameter is debated. The predominant cause of CAAs is atherosclerotic disease. Independently, CAAs constitute an estimated 5-year survival of 71%. Case summary: We report the case of a 56-year-old female who presented 20 years ago with a chest infection when a murmur was auscultated on examination. Subsequently, a coronary angiogram was performed, demonstrating an extensive aneurysm of the right coronary artery (RCA). The aneurysmal segment of the RCA was resected, and a length of saphenous vein was utilized in its reconstruction. Twenty years later, the patient re-presented with dyspnoea, indicating repeat investigations; coronary angiography demonstrated a vein graft 20 years post-reconstruction that is almost indistinguishable from a native RCA. Discussion: The optimal management strategy for CAAs is debatable, and there are no clear guidelines. However, surgical management is generally preferred in cases of GCAAs, which was also the case for this patient. This reconstruction procedure, involving resection of the aneurysmal segment of the RCA and reconstruction with a saphenous vein graft, proved to be a durable and reliable approach, with the saphenous vein graft remaining patent for over 20 years. The 20-year follow-up provides valuable insight into the long-term durability of surgical intervention, allowing for comprehensive assessment of the durability and reliability of this procedure.

Indexed as

Case reportCoronary artery aneurysmCT angiographyResection and reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID39381327
PMCPMC11458912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.