Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381321›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2024

Comparison of functional and radiological outcome of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures treated using PFN and PFNA in patients with osteoporosis.

P Bala Murugan, Sheik Mohideen, E Pradeep, K V Arun Kumar, Haemanath Pandian, V Y Ashwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P Bala MuruganDepartment of Orthopedics, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sheik MohideenDepartment of Orthopedics, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.
E PradeepDepartment of Orthopedics, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.
K V Arun KumarDepartment of Orthopedics, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.
Haemanath PandianDepartment of Orthopedics, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.
V Y AshwinDepartment of Orthopedics, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Unstable intertrochanteric fracture poses challenges in terms of obtaining stable fixation and good post-operative outcomes. There is a paucity of clinical data comparing the commonly used proximal femoral nail (PFN) and PFN anti-rotation (PFNA) implants, especially in relation to osteoporosis. The purpose of this study is to assess the comparative performance of PFN and PFNA fixation in the treatment of unstable femur intertrochanteric fractures. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted to understand and analyze the advantages of PFNA over PFN in the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures from May 2021 to October 2023 at the Department of Orthopaedics, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kelambakkam. Patients presenting with an unstable intertrochanteric fracture with Singh's Index grades 1, 2, and 3 were included. Boyd and Griffin classification types 2, 3, and 4 were included in the study. The patients were randomized into two types of implant groups. All patients were operated with a standard protocol. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months and any complications were noted. A comparison of functional outcomes was done using the Modified Harris Hip Score. Statistical analysis was done using the unpaired t-test/Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Every follow-up period included a Harris Hip Score assessment. At 3 months, the average score of PFN was 71.9 (range 66-81) and at 6 months it was 77.86 (range 72-90). For PFNA, at 3 months, the average score was 74.87 (range 66-81), and at 6 months, it was 89.3 (range 76-94). The improvement was seen well in the PFNA group which is statistically significant (P = 0.023). The most prevalent fracture was a type 2 fracture. Conclusion: The results showed PFNA has better rotation stability with single screws and better functional outcomes in treating unstable intertrochanteric fractures when compared to PFN.

Indexed as

communicated fragmentslateral trochanteric wallProximal femoral nailunstable trochanteric fracture

Identifiers

PMID39381321
PMCPMC11458224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.