Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381244›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Embedded values-like shape ethical reasoning of large language models on primary care ethical dilemmas.

Dorit Hadar-Shoval, Kfir Asraf, Shiri Shinan-Altman, Zohar Elyoseph, Inbar Levkovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Atencion primaria · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Digital bioethics: exploring an emerging field.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dorit Hadar-ShovalThe Center for Psychobiological Research, Department of Psychology and Educational Counseling, Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Israel.
Kfir AsrafThe Center for Psychobiological Research, Department of Psychology and Educational Counseling, Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Israel.
Shiri Shinan-AltmanThe Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Zohar ElyosephThe Center for Psychobiological Research, Department of Psychology and Educational Counseling, Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Israel.
Inbar LevkovichThe Department of Education, Tel Hai College, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This article uses the framework of Schwartz's values theory to examine whether the embedded values-like profile within large language models (LLMs) impact ethical decision-making dilemmas faced by primary care. It specifically aims to evaluate whether each LLM exhibits a distinct values-like profile, assess its alignment with general population values, and determine whether latent values influence clinical recommendations. Methods: The Portrait Values Questionnaire-Revised (PVQ-RR) was submitted to each LLM (Claude, Bard, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4) 20 times to ensure reliable and valid responses. Their responses were compared to a benchmark derived from a diverse international sample consisting of over 53,000 culturally diverse respondents who completed the PVQ-RR. Four vignettes depicting prototypical professional quandaries involving conflicts between competing values were presented to the LLMs. The option selected by each LLM and the strength of its recommendation were evaluated to determine if underlying values-like impact output. Results: Each LLM demonstrated a unique values-like profile. Universalism and self-direction were prioritized, while power and tradition were assigned less importance than population benchmarks, suggesting potential Western-centric biases. Four clinical vignettes involving value conflicts were presented to the LLMs. Preliminary indications suggested that embedded values-like influence recommendations. Significant variances in confidence strength regarding chosen recommendations materialized between models, proposing that further vetting is required before the LLMs can be relied on as judgment aids. However, the overall selection of preferences aligned with intrinsic value hierarchies. Conclusion: The distinct intrinsic values-like embedded within LLMs shape ethical decision-making, which carries implications for their integration in primary care settings serving diverse populations. For context-appropriate, equitable delivery of AI-assisted healthcare globally it is essential that LLMs are tailored to align with cultural outlooks.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceLarge language model (LLM)Primary care physiciansValuesVignette

Identifiers

PMID39381244
PMCPMC11458949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.