ReviewHeliyon2024
Dual-locked fluorescent probes for precise diagnosis and targeted treatment of tumors.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical probes for enzyme imaging: challenges in design, synthesis and biomedical applications.Chemical science · 2025Review
- A new GFP chromophore analogue for detection of viscosity and cysteine with AND logic-gate-based fluorescence readout.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Molecular imaging using (nano)probes: cutting-edge developments and clinical challenges in diagnostics.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Recent Advances of Nitrobenzoselenadiazole for Imaging and Therapy.ACS sensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer continues to pose a significant threat to global health, with its high mortality rates largely attributable to delayed diagnosis and non-specific treatments. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial, yet it remains challenging due to the subtle and often undetectable early molecular changes. Traditional single-target fluorescent probes often fail to accurately identify cancer cells, relying solely on single biomarkers and consequently leading to high rates of false positives and inadequate specificity. In contrast, dual-locked fluorescent probes represent a breakthrough, designed to enhance diagnostic precision. By requiring the simultaneous presence of two specific tumor-associated biomarkers or microenvironmental conditions, these probes significantly reduce non-specific activations typical of conventional single-analyte probes. This review discusses the structural designs, response mechanisms, and biological applications of dual-locked probes, highlighting their potential in tumor imaging and treatment. Importantly, the review addresses the challenges, and perspectives in this field, offering a comprehensive look at the current state and future potential of dual-locked fluorescent probes in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.