Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381151›Full record

ArticleJournal of trauma and injury2024

Radiologic assessment of the optimal point for tube thoracostomy using the sternum as a landmark: a computed tomography-based analysis.

Jaeik Jang, Jae-Hyug Woo, Mina Lee, Woo Sung Choi, Yong Su Lim, Jin Seong Cho, Jae Ho Jang, Jea Yeon Choi, Sung Youl Hyun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of trauma and injury, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jaeik JangDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.ORCID 0009-0001-3202-749X
Jae-Hyug WooDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9710-3265
Mina LeeDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.ORCID 0009-0007-5892-9428
Woo Sung ChoiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0011-0985
Yong Su LimDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4390-4010
Jin Seong ChoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6762-4692
Jae Ho JangDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8625-9803
Jea Yeon ChoiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9326-5897
Sung Youl HyunGachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9419-244X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed at developing a novel tube thoracostomy technique using the sternum, a fixed anatomical structure, as an indicator to reduce the possibility of incorrect chest tube positioning and complications in patients with chest trauma. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the data of 184 patients with chest trauma who were aged ≥18 years, visited a single regional trauma center in Korea between April and June 2022, and underwent chest computed tomography (CT) with their arms down. The conventional gold standard, 5th intercostal space (ICS) method, was compared to the lower 1/2, 1/3, and 1/4 of the sternum method by analyzing CT images. Results: When virtual tube thoracostomy routes were drawn at the mid-axillary line at the 5th ICS level, 150 patients (81.5%) on the right side and 179 patients (97.3%) on the left did not pass the diaphragm. However, at the lower 1/2 of the sternum level, 171 patients (92.9%, P<0.001) on the right and 182 patients (98.9%, P= 0.250) on the left did not pass the diaphragm. At the 5th ICS level, 129 patients (70.1%) on the right and 156 patients (84.8%) on the left were located in the safety zone and did not pass the diaphragm. Alternatively, at the lower 1/2, 1/3, and 1/4 of the sternum level, 139 (75.5%, P=0.185), 49 (26.6%, P<0.001), and 10 (5.4%, P<0.001), respectively, on the right, and 146 (79.3%, P=0.041), 69 (37.5%, P<0.001), and 16 (8.7%, P<0.001) on the left were located in the safety zone and did not pass the diaphragm. Compared to the conventional 5th ICS method, the sternum 1/2 method had a safety zone prediction sensitivity of 90.0% to 90.7%, and 97.3% to 100% sensitivity for not passing the diaphragm. Conclusions: Using the sternum length as a tube thoracostomy indicator might be feasible.

Indexed as

PneumothoraxSternumThoracic injuriesThoracostomyX-ray computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID39381151
PMCPMC11309195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.