ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
A comprehensive in silico analysis and experimental validation of miRNAs capable of discriminating between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Prognostic Role of miR-375 in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-based miRNA analysis for precision oncology: diagnostic and prognostic insights.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Deep Learning-Driven Multimodal Integration of miRNA and Radiomic for Lung Cancer Diagnosis.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Loss of miRNA-Mediated VEGFA Regulation by SNP-Induced Impairment: A Bioinformatic Analysis in Diabetic Complications.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate differentiation between lung adenocarcinoma (AC) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is crucial owing to their distinct therapeutic approaches. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) exhibit variable expression across subtypes, making them promising biomarkers for discrimination. This study aimed to identify miRNAs with robust discriminatory potential between AC and SCC and elucidate their clinical significance. Methods: MiRNA expression profiles for AC and SCC patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Differential expression analysis and supervised machine learning methods (Support Vector Machine, Decision trees and Naïve Bayes) were employed. Clinical significance was assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, survival analysis, and correlation with clinicopathological features. Validation was conducted using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Furthermore, signaling pathway and gene ontology enrichment analyses were conducted to unveil biological functions. Results: Five miRNAs (miR-205-3p, miR-205-5p, miR-944, miR-375 and miR-326) emerged as potential discriminative markers. The combination of miR-944 and miR-326 yielded an impressive area under the curve of 0.985. RT-qPCR validation confirmed their biomarker potential. miR-326 and miR-375 were identified as prognostic factors in AC, while miR-326 and miR-944 correlated significantly with survival outcomes in SCC. Additionally, exploration of signaling pathways implicated their involvement in key pathways including PI3K-Akt, MAPK, FoxO, and Ras. Conclusion: This study enhances our understanding of miRNAs as discriminative markers between AC and SCC, shedding light on their role as prognostic indicators and their association with clinicopathological characteristics. Moreover, it highlights their potential involvement in signaling pathways crucial in non-small cell lung cancer pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.