Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381099›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Recent advances of chitosan-based composite hydrogel materials in application of bone tissue engineering.

Jianyang Shan, Yaling Yu, Xiaohan Liu, Yimin Chai, Xing Wang, Gen Wen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Hydrogels and nanogels: effectiveness in dermal applications.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jianyang ShanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Center for Orthopaedic Medicine, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Yaling YuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Center for Orthopaedic Medicine, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Xiaohan LiuDepartment of Plastic surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025,China.
Yimin ChaiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Center for Orthopaedic Medicine, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Xing WangBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Gen WenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Center for Orthopaedic Medicine, Shanghai, 200233, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone defects, stemming from trauma, tumors, infections, and congenital conditions, pose significant challenges in orthopedics. Although the body possesses innate mechanisms for bone self-repairing, factors such as aging, disease, and injury can impair these processes, jeopardizing skeletal integrity. Addressing substantial bone defects remains a global orthopedic concern, with variables like gender, lifestyle and preexisting conditions influencing fracture risk and complication rates. Traditional repair methods, mainly bone transplantation including autografts, allografts and xenografts, have shown effectiveness but also present limitations. Autologous bone grafts, highly valued for their osteogenic properties, require additional surgeries with extended hospitalization, and carry risks associated with the donor site. The development of advanced biomaterials offers promising new avenues for bone repair. An ideal material should exhibit a combination of biocompatibility, biodegradability, bone conduction, porosity, strength, and the ability to stimulate bone formation. Chitosan (CS), derived from chitin, stands out due to its biocompatibility, biodegradability, low immunogenicity, non-toxicity, and a wide range of biological activities, including antioxidant, anti-tumor, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and immunomodulatory properties. Notably, CS has shown the properties to promote bone regeneration, increase bone density, and accelerate fracture healing. This review provides a comprehensive examination of CS-based hydrogels for bone repair aiming to inspire researchers by presenting new ideas for innovative CS-based solutions, thereby advancing their potential applications in the field of bone repair.

Identifiers

PMID39381099
PMCPMC11456830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.