Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381048›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Accuracy of four models and update strategies to estimate liver tumor motion from external respiratory motion.

Payam Samadi Miandoab, Esben Worm, Rune Hansen, Britta Weber, Morten Høyer, Shahyar Saramad, Saeed Setayeshi, Per Rugaard Poulsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Payam Samadi MiandoabDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Esben WormDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Rune HansenDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Britta WeberDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Morten HøyerDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Shahyar SaramadDepartment of Energy Engineering and Physics, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Saeed SetayeshiDepartment of Energy Engineering and Physics, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Per Rugaard PoulsenDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study investigates different strategies for estimating internal liver tumor motion during radiotherapy based on continuous monitoring of external respiratory motion combined with sparse internal imaging. Methods: Fifteen patients underwent three-fraction stereotactic liver radiotherapy. The 3D internal tumor motion (INT) was monitored by electromagnetic transponders while a camera monitored the external marker block motion (EXT). The ability of four external-internal correlation models (ECM) to estimate INT as function of EXT was investigated: a simple linear model (ECM1), an augmented linear model (ECM2), an augmented quadratic model (ECM3), and an extended quadratic model (ECM4). Each ECM was constructed by fitting INT and EXT during the first 60s of each fraction. The fit accuracy was calculated as the root-mean-square error (RMSE) between ECM-estimated and actual tumor motion. Next, the RMSE of the ECM-estimated tumor motion throughout the fractions was calculated for four simulated ECM update strategies: (A) no update, 0.33Hz internal sampling with continuous update of either (B) all ECM parameters based on the last 2 minutes samples or (C) only the baseline term based on the last 5 samples, (D) full ECM update every minute using 20s continuous internal sampling. Results: The augmented quadratic ECM3 had best fit accuracy with mean (± SD)) RMSEs of 0.32 ± 0.11mm (left-right, LR), 0.79 ± 0.30mm (cranio-caudal, CC) and 0.56 ± 0.31mm (anterior-posterior, AP). However, the simpler augmented linear ECM2 combined with frequent baseline updates (update strategy C) gave best motion estimations with mean RMSEs of 0.41 ± 0.14mm (LR), 1.02 ± 0.33mm (CC) and 0.78 ± 0.48mm (AP). This was significantly better than all other ECM-update strategy combinations for CC motion (Wilcoxon signed rank p<0.05). Conclusion: The augmented linear ECM2 combined with frequent baseline updates provided the best compromise between fit accuracy and robustness towards irregular motion. It allows accurate internal motion monitoring by combining external motioning with sparse 0.33Hz kV imaging, which is available at conventional linacs.

Indexed as

external-internal motion correlationintrafraction motionliver radiotherapyreal-time tumor trackingtumor motion monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39381048
PMCPMC11458717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.