Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381041›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

A complete benchmark for polyp detection, segmentation and classification in colonoscopy images.

Yael Tudela, Mireia Majó, Neil de la Fuente, Adrian Galdran, Adrian Krenzer, Frank Puppe, Amine Yamlahi, Thuy Nuong Tran, Bogdan J Matuszewski, Kerr Fitzgerald and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yael TudelaComputer Vision Center and Computer Science Department, Universitat Autònoma de Cerdanyola del Valles, Barcelona, Spain.
Mireia MajóComputer Vision Center and Computer Science Department, Universitat Autònoma de Cerdanyola del Valles, Barcelona, Spain.
Neil de la FuenteComputer Vision Center and Computer Science Department, Universitat Autònoma de Cerdanyola del Valles, Barcelona, Spain.
Adrian GaldranDepartment of Information and Communication Technologies, SymBioSys Research Group, BCNMedTech, Barcelona, Spain.
Adrian KrenzerArtificial Intelligence and Knowledge Systems, Institute for Computer Science, Julius-Maximilians University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Frank PuppeArtificial Intelligence and Knowledge Systems, Institute for Computer Science, Julius-Maximilians University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Amine YamlahiDivision of Intelligent Medical Systems, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Thuy Nuong TranDivision of Intelligent Medical Systems, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Bogdan J MatuszewskiComputer Vision and Machine Learning (CVML) Research Group, University of Central Lancashir (UCLan), Preston, United Kingdom.
Kerr FitzgeraldComputer Vision and Machine Learning (CVML) Research Group, University of Central Lancashir (UCLan), Preston, United Kingdom.
Cheng BianHebei University of Technology, Baoding, China.
Junwen PanTianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Shijle LiuHebei University of Technology, Baoding, China.
Gloria Fernández-EsparrachDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Aymeric HistaceETIS UMR 8051, École Nationale Supérieure de l'Électronique et de ses Applications (ENSEA), Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS), CY Paris Cergy University, Cergy, France.
Jorge BernalComputer Vision Center and Computer Science Department, Universitat Autònoma de Cerdanyola del Valles, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the main causes of deaths worldwide. Early detection and diagnosis of its precursor lesion, the polyp, is key to reduce its mortality and to improve procedure efficiency. During the last two decades, several computational methods have been proposed to assist clinicians in detection, segmentation and classification tasks but the lack of a common public validation framework makes it difficult to determine which of them is ready to be deployed in the exploration room. Methods: This study presents a complete validation framework and we compare several methodologies for each of the polyp characterization tasks. Results: Results show that the majority of the approaches are able to provide good performance for the detection and segmentation task, but that there is room for improvement regarding polyp classification. Discussion: While studied show promising results in the assistance of polyp detection and segmentation tasks, further research should be done in classification task to obtain reliable results to assist the clinicians during the procedure. The presented framework provides a standarized method for evaluating and comparing different approaches, which could facilitate the identification of clinically prepared assisting methods.

Indexed as

computer-aided diagnosismedical imagingpolyp classificationpolyp detectionpolyp segmentation

Identifiers

PMID39381041
PMCPMC11458519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.