Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39380951›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2024

Metabolomics-based biomarkers of fermented dairy and red meat intake: a randomized controlled trial in healthy adults.

Giorgia La Barbera, Giulia Praticò, Lars Ove Dragsted, Catalina Cuparencu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giorgia La BarberaDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Giulia PraticòDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars Ove DragstedDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Catalina CuparencuDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dietary assessment is usually performed through imprecise tools, leading to error-prone associations between diet and health-related outcomes. Metabolomics has been applied in recent years to develop biomarkers of food intake (BFIs) and to study metabolites in the diet-microbiome crosstalk. Candidate BFIs exist to detect intake of meat and to a lesser extent dairy, but validation and further development of BFIs are needed. Here, we aim to identify biomarkers that differentiate between intakes of red meat and dairy, to validate previously reported BFIs for these foods, and to explore the effect of protein-matched meals on selected microbial metabolites. Methods: We conducted a randomized, controlled, cross-over single-meal study comparing a meal with highly fermented yogurt and cheese, and a meal with beef and pork meatballs. Postprandial urine samples from 17 subjects were collected sequentially after each meal up to 24 h and analyzed by untargeted metabolomics through ultra-high-performance-liquid chromatography (UHPLC) coupled via electrospray (ESI) source to a qTOF mass spectrometer. Univariate (repeated measures ANOVA) and multivariate (PLSDA, ML-PLSDA) data analyses were used to select BFIs differentiating the two meals. 3-Indoxyl sulfate, p-cresol sulfate, and several other microbial amino acid catabolites were additionally explored within the urine profiles. Results: Thirty-eight markers of meat and dairy intake were selected and are presented along with their excretion kinetics. Carnosine, taurine, and creatine, as well as hydroxyproline-based dipeptides are confirmed as meat BFIs. For dairy, previously reported metabolites such as acyl-glycines are confirmed, while proline-based dipeptides are reported as novel putative BFIs. Microbial metabolites showed only marginal evidence of differential formation after the two meals. Conclusion: This study allowed us to validate the postprandial kinetics of previously suggested biomarkers of meat and dairy intake and to identify new potential biomarkers. The excretion kinetics are useful to ensure that the collection of urine covers the correct time window in future dietary studies. The BFIs add to the existing body of biomarkers and may further be used in combination to provide a more reliable assessment of meat and dairy intake. Proteolytic microbial metabolites should be further investigated to assess the effect of different protein sources on health.

Indexed as

biomarkers of food intakedairyhigh-resolution mass spectrometryliquid chromatographymetabolomicsmicrobial metabolitesred meat

Identifiers

PMID39380951
PMCPMC11459089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.