ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients receiving zoledronic acid using FAERS and canadian databases.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Precision Bisphosphonate Therapy in Osteoporosis: Mechanisms, Clinical Applications, Risks, and Future Directions.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Osteonecrosis Risk Using Serum C-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen (CTX-1) Levels in Osteoporotic Patients: Effects of Drug Holidays and Risk Factors.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a risk scoring system for predicting post-extraction medication-related osteonecrosis of jaws: A derivation and validation cohort study.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Nomogram-based prediction model for tocilizumab-induced leukopenia in adults using FAERS and PMDA data.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026Observational
- Agglomerative clustering-based drugs graded for the risk signals of drug-induced cognitive disorder: a study on the FAERS database.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2026Article
- Craniofacial Effects of Zoledronic Acid on the Osteogenesis Imperfecta Mouse (-/-) Model of Severe Osteogenesis Imperfecta.Biomedicines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) stands as a severe complication linked to the use of bisphosphonates, particularly zoledronic acid, which is widely prescribed for managing conditions like osteoporosis and bone metastasis. This study is geared towards the development and validation of a clinical prediction model for ONJ in patients undergoing zoledronic acid treatment. Methods: We harnessed data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) as our training dataset, while the Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction (CVAR) database served as the testing dataset. The study encompassed patients treated with zoledronic acid and subsequently diagnosed with ONJ. We analysed a range of predictive factors, including breast cancer, bone metastasis, osteoporosis, vitamin D and calcium levels, comorbidities, the number of concomitant medications, dosage, age, weight, and gender. Logistic regression and nomogram analysis were the chosen methodologies for constructing the predictive model. To evaluate the model's performance, we utilized receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The study encompassed a total of 2,126 patients in the training cohort, 911 patients in the internal test cohort from the FAERS database, and 121 patients in the external test cohort from the CVAR database. Notable predictors for ONJ included bone metastasis (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.22-2.24), osteoporosis (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21-0.52), the number of concomitant medications (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.05-1.09), and the dosage of zoledronic acid (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.10-1.39). The nomogram exhibited robust discriminatory power, evidenced by an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 in the training cohort, 0.76 in the internal test cohort, and 0.90 in the external test cohort. Calibration plots demonstrated a strong alignment between observed and predicted probabilities. Furthermore, DCA highlighted the prediction model's significant net benefit across various threshold probabilities. Conclusion: By leveraging data from both the FAERS and Canadian databases, this study has successfully developed and validated a clinical prediction model for ONJ in patients receiving zoledronic acid. This model stands as a valuable tool for clinicians, enabling them to pinpoint high-risk patients and make evidence-based treatment decisions to minimize the risk of ONJ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.