ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroinflammation after stroke: initiation, amplification and therapeutic prospects.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Discovery of metabolite biomarkers for cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury based on metabolomics: neurotoxic mechanism and functional validation of a flavopiridol -related metabolite.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Effects and Mechanisms of Dietary Natural Products on Ischemic Stroke: An Updated Review.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
- NLRP3 Inflammasome-Mediated Pyroptosis in Osteoporosis: Osteoimmune Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targeting.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Antioxidant profiling and quality assessment of Lithocarpus polystachyus sweet tea using LC-ECD and LC-MS/MS.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Macrophage Polarization in Myocardial Ischemia‒Reperfusion Injury: Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Targets.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
- The cGAS-STING pathway in ischemia-reperfusion injury in acute cerebral infarction: a new therapeutic opportunities?Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ischemic stroke (IS) is a serious threat to human life and health, and cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury (CIRI) exacerbates IS by enhancing neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. Sweet tea (ST) comprises several bioactive components, such as phlorizin, trilobatin, and phloretin, with diverse pharmacological activities. However, it remains uncertain whether ST can confer protection against CIRI. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact and potential underlying mechanism of ST in the context of CIRI. Methods: CIRI model were established in male sprague dawley (SD) rats. The neurobehavioral assessment, the volume of cerebral infarction and the morphology of neurons were measured to complete the preliminary pharmacodynamic study. The therapeutic targets and pathways of ST on IS were obtained by protein-protein interaction, molecular docking and Metascape database. The predicted results were further verified Results: Our results revealed that ST treatment significantly ameliorated brain damage in rats subjected to CIRI by mitigating mitochondrial oxidative stress and neuroinflammation. Additionally, we identified the PI3K/AKT/NF-κB pathway and the NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis axis as crucial processes, with molecular docking suggested direct interactions between the main compounds of ST and NLRP3. Conclusion: ST safeguards against CIRI-induced neuronal loss, neuroinflammation and oxidative stress through the inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/NF-κB pathway and the regulation of NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.