Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39380892›Full record

ArticleActa radiologica open2024

Differential diagnosis between low-risk and high-risk thymoma: Comparison of diagnostic performance of radiologists with and without deep learning model.

Yuriko Yoshida, Masahiro Yanagawa, Yukihisa Sato, Tomo Miyata, Atsushi Kawata, Akinori Hata, Noriyuki Tomiyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta radiologica open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuriko YoshidaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaksa, Japan.
Masahiro YanagawaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaksa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0911-6769
Yukihisa SatoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Suita Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Tomo MiyataDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Sakai City Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Atsushi KawataDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Akinori HataDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaksa, Japan.
Noriyuki TomiyamaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaksa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There are few CT-based deep learning (DL) studies on thymoma according to the World Health Organization classification. Purpose: To develop a CT-based DL model to distinguish between low-risk and high-risk thymoma and to compare the diagnostic performance of radiologists with and without the DL model. Material and Methods: 159 patients with 160 thymomas were included. A fine-tuning VGG16 network model with Adam optimizer was used, followed by k-fold cross validation. The dataset consisted of three axial slices, including the maximum tumor size from the CT volume data. The data were augmented 50 times by rotation, zoom, shear, and horizontal/vertical flip. Three independent networks for the CT dataset were considered, and the result was determined by voting. Three radiologists independently diagnosed thymomas with and without the model. The area under the curve (AUC) of the diagnostic performance was compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: Accuracy of the DL model was 71.3%. Diagnostic performance of the radiologists was as follows: AUC and accuracy without the DL model, 0.61-0.68 and 61.9%-69.3%; and with the DL model, 0.66-0.69 and 68.1%-70.0%, respectively. AUC of the diagnostic performance showed no significant differences between radiologists with and without the DL model. The DL model tended to increase the diagnostic accuracy, but AUC was not significantly improved. Conclusion: Diagnostic performance of the DL was comparable to that of radiologists. The DL model assistance tended to increase diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

CT imagingDeep learningmediastinumradiologyrisk classificationthymoma

Identifiers

PMID39380892
PMCPMC11457241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.