ArticleAME case reports2024
Use of 3D-printed model to plan the surgical management of a patient with isolated orbital floor fracture: a case report.
Article in AME case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical study on precision repair of orbital fractures using 3D-printed orbital models assisting with absorbable plates.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Orbital floor fractures typically manifest as eyeball mobility disorders with double vision (diplopia), enophthalmia, and infraorbital paresis. Surgical treatment of these fractures involves orbital floor reconstruction. The procedure involves freeing the trapped tissues from the lumen of the maxillary sinus and rebuilding the orbital floor. Technological progress in the field of three-dimensional (3D) printing allows physical prototyping of the implants to be used during the procedure. Case Description: A 43-year-old female patient presented to the hospital with diplopia, which first occurred after a fall from own height. Examinations, including a computed tomography (CT) confirmed the diagnosis of an orbital floor fracture. 3D printing was used to plan the surgical treatment of the patient. Based on preoperative CT, a 1:1 scale model was prepared by means of 3D printing to demonstrate the fractured orbital area. It was later used to pre-cut a Codubix prosthesis, which was subsequently used to reconstruct the fractured bone. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful. Instant improvement in diplopia was noted. A CT scan was performed on the 3 Conclusions: 3D printing seems to be a useful method that allows more thorough preparation for the surgery and also could potentially shorten its duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.