ArticleRadiology case reports2024
Diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas of asymptomatic intracranial AVMs: A case report and evidence-based review.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occipital Pial AVM Rupture in a Young Adult: Dual Intranidal Aneurysms, Solitary Parasagittal SSS Drainage, and Hematoma-Corridor Microsurgical Cure.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes and radiation-induced complications following stereotactic radiosurgery for a left temporal arteriovenous malformation: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
First described by Virchow in the 19th century, intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex, tangle-shaped vascular lesions with a number of associated neuroparenchymal, hemodynamic, and angio-architectural changes. However, the clinical description of extracranial AVMs dates back to the Ebers Papyrus (c. 1500 BC), with a still unknown definitive underlying etiology thus far. AVMs are rare lesions, with approximately 0.15% incidence and 0.001-0.5% prevalence, but of high importance as they tend to affect young patients who are frequently otherwise healthy. In the majority of cases, AVMs present as sudden intracranial hemorrhages that require immediate intervention, but incidentally-detected unruptured AVMs are only found in ∼15% of cases, leaving a confusing dilemma regarding the appropriate next step, particularly given the several therapeutic interventions available and clinical trials that were vulnerable to follow-up criticism. Herein, we present a case of an incidentally detected asymptomatic AVM in a 15-year-old boy via advanced imaging techniques that was initially misinterpreted as a post-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage on routine imaging studies. In providing a comprehensive overview of pathological classification schemes and the currently available diagnostic options for these silent dilemmatic AVMs, we highlight three management techniques: microsurgical resection, endovascular embolization, and stereotactic surgery, with the best option depends mostly on addressing lesion resection properly with minimal associated mortality and morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.