ArticleRadiology case reports2024
Incidental finding of aberrant left common carotid artery during intracerebral hemorrhage examination.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a case involving an aortic arch anomaly that has not been previously documented. The patients were a 76-year-old female who was urgently transported to the hospital because of a sudden disturbance of consciousness. Neurological symptoms indicated impending brain herniation, and the patient was diagnosed with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (left putamen-thalamus) and acute hydrocephalus, thereafter she died approximately 6 hours after arrival. Head and neck-to-chest computed tomography angiography revealed an atypical aortic arch branching pattern. From the proximal side, the left common carotid artery, right common carotid artery, right subclavian artery, and left subclavian artery originated sequentially, suggesting an aberrant left common carotid artery. In the context of acute stroke management, understanding such aortic arch variations is crucial for planning access routes and treatment strategies for neuroendovascular procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.