ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2024
Patient-reported treatment satisfaction in essential tremor: levels of satisfaction and predictors of satisfaction.
Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuropsychiatric, stress-related symptoms and essential tremor clinical variability.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Article
- Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Tremors.Toxins · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Although managing symptoms is paramount for both essential tremor (ET) patients and their healthcare providers, studies of treatment satisfaction are surprisingly lacking. Objectives: We evaluated the satisfaction of patients who used a range of treatments and assessed the relation of a wide array of factors to satisfaction. Methods: One hundred four ET participants (age = 74.5 ± 10.2 years) completed a battery of self-report items. These included demographic information, measures of tremor and clinical history, psychological state, current ET treatment, and a series of questions about satisfaction with treatment. Results: Analyses of responses to the four current treatment satisfaction questions revealed that the proportion of participants who were satisfied ranged from 35.0% to 57.3% (i.e., approximately 1/3 to 1/2); conversely, the proportion who were dissatisfied ranged from 9.2% to 37.0%. The remainder were neutral. Higher satisfaction levels were observed in participants who were included in treatment selection and who had undergone deep brain stimulation surgery, Conclusion: Between 1/3 and 1/2 of patients were satisfied with their treatment, whereas up to 1/3 were dissatisfied. In this initial exploration of correlates of treatment satisfaction in ET patients, we identified a number of associations between satisfaction and clinical, psychological and treatment variables. Additional research is warranted to further explore the nature of these relations over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.