Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39380684›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024

Comparison of antimicrobial activities and resistance mechanisms of eravacycline and tigecycline against clinical

Xiandi Chen, Yitan Li, Yingzhuo Lin, Yingyi Guo, Guohua He, Xiaohu Wang, Mingzhen Wang, Jianbo Xu, Mingdong Song, Xixi Tan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Evolution, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Implications of Mobile Tetracycline Destructases.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Emergence of a multidrug-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xiandi Chen *Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, People's Hospital of Yangjiang, Yangjiang, China.
Yitan Li *Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, People's Hospital of Yangjiang, Yangjiang, China.
Yingzhuo Lin *Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, People's Hospital of Yangjiang, Yangjiang, China.
Yingyi GuoGuangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guohua HeKey Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, People's Hospital of Yangjiang, Yangjiang, China.
Xiaohu WangKey Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, People's Hospital of Yangjiang, Yangjiang, China.
Mingzhen WangKey Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, People's Hospital of Yangjiang, Yangjiang, China.
Jianbo XuKey Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, People's Hospital of Yangjiang, Yangjiang, China.
Mingdong SongKey Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, People's Hospital of Yangjiang, Yangjiang, China.
Xixi TanKey Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, People's Hospital of Yangjiang, Yangjiang, China.
Chao ZhuoGuangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiwei LinKey Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, People's Hospital of Yangjiang, Yangjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tigecycline (TGC) is currently used to treat carbapenem-resistant

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiantimicrobial activityeravacyclineISAba1 insertionresistance mechanismtigecycline

Identifiers

PMID39380684
PMCPMC11458409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.