ArticleResuscitation plus2024
Successful Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) deployment by emergency medicine physicians for refractory non-traumatic cardiac arrest.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Cardiac arrest afflicts over 600,000 people annually in the United States. Rates of survival from cardiac arrest have remained stagnant for decades. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is most commonly used in the management of severe hemorrhagic shock, primarily for non-compressible thoracoabdominal trauma. A growing body of evidence suggests it may serve a role in augmenting cardiac and cerebral perfusion in non-traumatic, refractory cardiac arrest. Typically, REBOA is deployed by interventional radiologists under real-time fluoroscopy. Limited data exist to demonstrate the feasibility or logistics of successful REBOA deployment in emergency departments by emergency medicine physicians. Methods: We describe an emergency medicine-driven training program and treatment protocol developed to deploy REBOA in the emergency department for patients experiencing refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and deemed ineligible for ECPR. We detail the training, certification processes, and clinical outcomes from our first eight cases. Results: Five emergency medicine physicians underwent training for REBOA placement through a didactic curriculum and hands-on training with mannequin and live tissue porcine models. Since protocol implementation, eight patients have undergone REBOA catheterization by emergency medicine physicians: 5 males and 3 females, age range 25-79. The first pass success was 8/8 (100 %), and all 3 commercially available catheters in the United States were successfully used. ROSC was achieved in 3/8 (37.5 %) patients, although no patients survived to hospital discharge. No REBOA catheter-associated complications were identified. Conclusions: This series demonstrates feasibility of emergency physician placed REBOA for non-traumatic, refractory cardiac arrest a novel resuscitative technique. Through a combination of focused education, innovative technology use, robust large animal model-based training, and strategic procedural integration, we showcase the potential for emergency departments to spearhead the adoption of this potentially life-saving intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.