Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39380624›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2024

Interventions to promote resilience and passion for work in health settings: A mixed-methods systematic review.

Supan Unjai, Elizabeth M Forster, Amy E Mitchell, Debra K Creedy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Supan UnjaiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, N48 Health Sciences Building, Level 2.06, 170 Kessels Road, QLD 4111, Australia.
Elizabeth M ForsterSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, N48 Health Sciences Building, Level 2.06, 170 Kessels Road, QLD 4111, Australia.
Amy E MitchellSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Australia.
Debra K CreedySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, N48 Health Sciences Building, Level 2.06, 170 Kessels Road, QLD 4111, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Resilience and passion for work are associated with better psychosocial wellbeing and professional quality of life for healthcare workers. Objective: To evaluate the characteristics and efficacy of interventions to promote resilience and passion for work in health settings. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across six databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO) for articles published between January 2003 and February 2023. Studies utilizing both quantitative and qualitative methodologies were included. Methodological quality assessment was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data from the included studies were analyzed using a convergent mixed methods design. Results: A total of 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. All reported on interventions designed to enhance resilience for healthcare workers. None reported on interventions to enhance passion for work. Interventions included mindfulness-based programs, psychoeducation workshops, stress management techniques, and professional coaching. Interventions varied widely in terms of delivery modality, format, content, intensity, duration, and outcomes. Of the studies reporting quantitative data, most (21/29) reported statistically significant improvements in resilience. Of the studies reporting qualitative data, all reported a positive impact of the intervention on resilience and psychological well-being. Conclusions: Overall, interventions designed to enhance resilience in health care settings appear to be effective across a variety of healthcare settings. The diversity of effective intervention approaches, delivery formats, intensity and duration suggest that brief, light-touch or self-directed online interventions may be equally as effective as more intensive, lengthy, in-person or group-based interventions. This provides health care organisations with the opportunity to select and flexibly implement interventions that align with organisational, and staff needs and preferences. Future research needs to explore effective approaches to building passion for work.

Indexed as

Healthcare workersInterventionPassionResilienceSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39380624
PMCPMC11460621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.