Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39380591›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2024

Association between dietary patterns and infant birth weight in brazilian pregnancy women with gestational diabetes: a cross-sectional study.

Luciana da Cunha Bernardes Argenta, Nadya Helena Alves Dos Santos, Cláudia Saunders, Joana Dias da Costa, Letícia Victoria Souza da Cunha, Pamela Melo Krok Fedeszen, Patricia de Carvalho Padilha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Insights into Reproductive Immunology and Placental Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luciana da Cunha Bernardes ArgentaUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de JaneiroRJ Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1773-3078
Nadya Helena Alves Dos SantosUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de JaneiroRJ Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0098-6047
Cláudia SaundersUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de JaneiroRJ Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8815-6736
Joana Dias da CostaUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de JaneiroRJ Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0758-5018
Letícia Victoria Souza da CunhaUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de JaneiroRJ Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4602-1474
Pamela Melo Krok FedeszenUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de JaneiroRJ Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7547-226X
Patricia de Carvalho PadilhaUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de JaneiroRJ Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0221-7732

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association between the dietary patterns (DPs) of pregnant women with GDM (gestational diabetes Methods: Cross-sectional study with 187 adult pregnant women with GDM attended at a maternity in Rio de Janeiro from 2011 to 2014. Dietary intake was assessed in the third trimester using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). The outcomes were BW and weight adequacy for gestational age (GA). Reduced Rank Regression (RRR) was used to explain the following response variables: density of carbohydrates, fibres, and saturated fatty acids. Statistical analyzes included multinomial logistic regression models. Results: The mean BW was 3261.9 (± 424.5) g. Three DPs were identified, with DP 3 (high consumption of refined carbohydrates, fast foods/snacks, whole milk, sugars/sweets, and soft drinks and low consumption of beans, vegetables, and low-fat milk and derivatives) being the main pattern, explaining 48.37% of the response variables. In the multinomial logistic regression analysis no statistically significant association was found between the tertiles of DPs and BW or the adequacy of weight for GA, even after adjustments of confounding covariates. Conclusion: No significant associations were found between maternal DPs in the third trimester of pregnancy and infant BW or adequacy of weight for GA.

Indexed as

Birth WeightDiabetes, GestationalAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDietFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyYoung AdultBirth weightDiabetes, gestationalDietary patternsInfant, newbornPregnant women

Identifiers

PMID39380591
PMCPMC11460409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.