Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39380585›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2024

Multidisciplinary team training in postpartum hemorrhage: impact on the use of blood products.

Carina Bauer Luiz, Ana Lúcia Letti Müller, Cristiano Caetano Salazar, Teresinha Zanella, Gabriel Cardozo Müller, Amanda Vilaverde Perez, Mariana Sbaraini, Maria Lucia Oppermann, Janete Vettorazzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carina Bauer LuizHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Porto AlegreRS Brazil Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2013-8301
Ana Lúcia Letti MüllerHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Porto AlegreRS Brazil Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1214-5664
Cristiano Caetano SalazarHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Porto AlegreRS Brazil Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2814-1396
Teresinha ZanellaHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Porto AlegreRS Brazil Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5791-8272
Gabriel Cardozo MüllerFaculdade de Medicina Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto AlegreRS Brazil Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6707-5996
Amanda Vilaverde PerezFaculdade de Medicina Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto AlegreRS Brazil Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3150-6675
Mariana SbarainiFaculdade de Medicina Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto AlegreRS Brazil Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9947-924X
Maria Lucia OppermannHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Porto AlegreRS Brazil Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6578-995X
Janete VettorazziHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Porto AlegreRS Brazil Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-6861

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Compare the number of puerperal women submitted to blood transfusion before and after the implementation of a care protocol for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) with multidisciplinary team training. Methods: Cross-sectional study in a university hospital, analyzing births from 2015 to 2019, compared the use of blood products before and after the adoption of a PPH protocol with multidisciplinary training. Results: Between 2015 and 2019, there were 17,731 births, with 299 (1.7%) postpartum women receiving blood products and 278 postpartum women were considered for this analysis, 128 (0.7%) at Time 1 and 150 (0.8%) at Time 2. After the multiprofessional team training (T2), there was a difference in the complete use of the PPH protocol (use of oxytocin, misoprostol and tranexamic acid) (T1 = 5.1% x T2 = 49.5%, p≤0.0001). An individual categorized analysis revealed that, in the T2 period, there was lower use of blood component units per patient compared to T1 (Mann-Whitney, p=0.006). It should be noted that at T1 and T2, 54% and 24% respectively received two units of blood products. It is important to highlight that after the multidisciplinary team training for the PPH protocol, the goal of zero maternal death due to hemorrhage was reached. Conclusion: The adoption of a specific protocol for PPH, combined with the training of a multidisciplinary team, had an impact on the ability to identify women at high risk of hemorrhage, resulting in a decrease in the use of blood components.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionPatient Care TeamPostpartum HemorrhageAdultClinical ProtocolsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMisoprostolOxytocinPregnancyMisoprostolOxytocinBlood transfusionMaternal deathMentoringPatient care teamPostpartum hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID39380585
PMCPMC11460414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.