Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39380535›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2024

Longitudinal evaluation of retinal neuroaxonal loss in epilepsy using optical coherence tomography.

Livia Stauner, Han Bao, Luisa Delazer, Isabel Kirsch, Tara Christmann, Soheyl Noachtar, Joachim Havla, Michael Lauseker, Elisabeth Kaufmann

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07716930 (Retina-Based Biomarkers in Epilepsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07716930 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Retina-Based Biomarkers in Epilepsy: Structural and Microvascular OCT Changes and Inflammatory Markers (sCD14, sCD163, CCL2, IL-1β) in Relation to Pathophysiology, Phenotype, Prognosis, and Drug-Resistant Epilepsy (DRE)

TypeobservationalSponsorKemal TutkavulRan2026 to 2028Enrolled250ConditionsEpilepsy (Treatment Refractory), Epilepsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Livia StaunerEpilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Han BaoInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Luisa DelazerEpilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1330-3628
Isabel KirschEpilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tara ChristmannInstitute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Soheyl NoachtarEpilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1314-6327
Joachim HavlaInstitute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Michael LausekerInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Elisabeth KaufmannEpilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7582-2215

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePeople with epilepsy (PwE) suffer from progressive brain atrophy, which is reflected as neuroaxonal loss on the retinal level. This study aims to provide initial insight into the longitudinal dynamics of the retinal neuroaxonal loss and possible driving factors.

methodsPwE and healthy controls (HC; 18-55 years of age) underwent spectral domain optical coherence tomography at baseline and 7.0 ± 1.5 and 6.7 ± 1.0 months later, respectively. The change in retinal thickness/volume and annualized percentage change (APC) were calculated for the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL), the macular RNFL (mRNFL), the ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIP), the inner nuclear layer, and the total macular volume (TMV). Group comparisons and multiple linear models with stepwise backward selection were performed to evaluate associations with demographic and clinical parameters.

resultsPwE (n = 44, 21 females, mean age = 35.6 ± 10.9 years) revealed a significant decrease in the pRNFL, mRNFL, GCIP, and TMV thickness or volume in the study interval. When compared to HC (n = 56, 37 females, mean age = 32.7 ± 8.3 years), the APC of the pRNFL (-.98 ± 3.13%/year) and the GCIP (-1.24 ± 2.56%/year) were significantly more pronounced in PwE (p = .01 and p = .046, respectively). Of note, atrophy of the mRNFL was significantly influenced by the number of antiseizure medications (ASMs; p = .047) and increasing age of PwE (p = .03). Contradictory results, however, were revealed for the impact of seizures. SIGNIFICANCE: In epilepsy, progression of retinal neuroaxonal loss was already detectable at short-term follow-up. PwE who receive a high number of ASMs seem to be at risk for accelerated neuroaxonal loss, stressing the importance of well-considered and effective antiseizure therapy.

Indexed as

EpilepsyRetinaTomography, Optical CoherenceAdolescentAdultAtrophyAxonsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersRetinal Ganglion CellsYoung Adultannualized percent changeatrophyepileptic seizuresneurodegenerationOCTRNFL

Identifiers

PMID39380535
PMCPMC11647422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.