SynthesisEuropean journal of orthodontics2024
Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of orthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Timing of extraction of compromised first permanent molars and spontaneous space closure without adjunctive orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Pooled it
- Orthodontic management in patients diagnosed with molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH): a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and epidemiological studies.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Pooled it
- Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of orthodontics · 2024Pooled it
- Hemisection versus conventional extraction as interceptive treatment in congenitally missing mandibular second premolars: a randomised controlled split-mouth trial.European journal of orthodontics · 2025Trial
- Dental and skeletal factors potentially influencing second molar mesialization following first permanent molar extraction: A 5-year follow-up study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Automated Prognostic Evaluation of First Permanent Molar Extractions Using YOLOv8 with Oriented Bounding Boxes on Pediatric Panoramic Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical Challenges in the Management of Complex Tooth Impaction and Transposition: A Case Series.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Radiographic indicators of favorable second permanent molar eruption are infrequently present at the time of first permanent molar extraction: a retrospective study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Spontaneous Second Molar Migration After MIH-Affected First Molars Extraction: A Radiographic-Based Method Evaluation.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Orthodontic mesialization of third molars using a t-shaped palatal indirect anchorage device for posterior dentition rehabilitation: a case report and literature review.BMC oral health · 2025Review
- GuREx-MIH: radiographic assessment of eruption patterns of second permanent molars and premolars in 11-year-olds after early extraction of the first permanent molar - a split-mouth trial.European journal of orthodontics · 2025Article
- Extraction of First Permanent Molars in Children-A Comprehensive Review of History, Aim, Space Closure and Other Consequences.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Second Versus First Molar Extractions in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treatment: A Retrospective Longitudinal Outcome Study into Maxillary Canine, Premolar, and Molar Movement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- To Treat or to Extract Necrotic First Permanent Molars Between 8 and 12 Years of Age: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Assessment Factors for Managing First Permanent Molars in Children with Poor Prognosis: A Systematic Mapping of Clinical Evidence.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtraction of the permanent first molars is sometimes necessitated in children and adolescents due to deep carious lesions or developmental defects.
objectiveTo estimate the prevalence of spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars and identify factors associated with it. SEARCH
methodsUnrestricted searches in five databases for human studies until February 2024. SELECTION CRITERIA: Longitudinal before-and-after (cohort) human studies assessing eruption of the permanent second molars and spontaneous space closure after extraction of the permanent first molar. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed in duplicate. Random-effects meta-analyses of average spontaneous space closure prevalences and odds ratios (OR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed, followed by meta-regression/sensitivity/reporting biases' analyses and evaluation of our confidence in effect estimates.
resultsSixteen reports pertaining to 15 studies (1 prospective /14 retrospective) were included covering 1159 patients (ages 5.5-15.0 years [mean 10.0 years]; 45% male on average) and 2310 permanent second molars. The prevalence of spontaneous space closure was higher in the maxilla (nine studies; 85.3%; 95% CI = 73.7%-92.3%) than the mandible (11 studies; 48.1%; 95% CI = 34.5%-62.0%) to a significant extent (nine studies; OR = 7.77; 95% CI = 4.99-12.11; P < 0.001). For both maxillary/mandibular second molars, Demirjian category E was associated with increased space closure odds than earlier/later stages (P < 0.05). Spontaneous space closure in the mandible was seen more often for patients ages 8-10 years (compared with older patients; three studies; OR = 3.32; 95% CI = 1.73-6.36; P < 0.001) and when the mandibular permanent third molar was present (four studies; OR = 2.28; 95% CI = 1.67-3.09; P = 0.003). Additional analyses failed to find any significant modifying factors. LIMITATIONS: The quality of evidence was very low in all instances due to the inclusion of retrospective studies with methodological issues.
conclusionsExisting evidence indicates that spontaneous space closure in children and adolescents after extraction of the permanent first molar is seen more often in the maxilla than the mandible. Extraction of the permanent first molar at the Demirjian stage E of the second molar and presence of the lower permanent third molar is associated with increased odds of space closure, but uncertainty persists, due to methodological issues of existing studies. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42023395371).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.