Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39380185›Full record

ArticleCancer science2024

A combination of lymphatic drug delivery of anti-CTLA-4 antibody and local radiotherapy for solid-tumor treatment.

Koki Takagi, Ariunbuyan Sukhbaatar, Yohei Inaba, Shiro Mori, Tetsuya Kodama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Koki TakagiLaboratory of Biomedical Engineering for Cancer, Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Ariunbuyan SukhbaatarLaboratory of Biomedical Engineering for Cancer, Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9137-2966
Yohei InabaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Shiro MoriLaboratory of Biomedical Engineering for Cancer, Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Tetsuya KodamaLaboratory of Biomedical Engineering for Cancer, Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4727-9558

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K20161Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K18319Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22K18203Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23H00543Suzuken Memorial Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy is a promising approach that has been shown in clinical trials to improve significantly survival and response rates compared with monotherapy against solid tumor. Since anti-CTLA-4 antibodies block immunosuppressive signals mainly in the lymph nodes (LNs), efficient drug delivery to the lymphatic system is desirable. However, the immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially anti-CTLA-4 are currently administered intravenously (i.v.), resulting in limited efficacy in controlling solid tumor and inhibiting metastases, and the method of administration has not been optimized. Here, we show that a combination of local radiotherapy and administration of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies using a lymphatic drug delivery system (LDDS) suppresses solid tumor and metastases. We compared the efficacy of LDDS-based immunotherapy or radioimmunotherapy with i.v. administration in a solid-tumor model created by subcutaneous inoculation into LN-swollen mice with osteosarcoma cells. Tumor-bearing mice were divided into various groups (no treatment, immunotherapy [i.v. or LDDS], radiotherapy, and radioimmunotherapy [i.v. or LDDS]) and were observed for 28 days. Immunotherapy was administered with a cumulative dose of 10 mg/kg of anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody, and radiotherapy was administered with a cumulative 8 Gy of fractionated X-ray irradiation. For immunotherapy alone, LDDS provided slight tumor growth inhibition but did not inhibit distant metastasis. For radioimmunotherapy, however, tumor growth was delayed and distant metastasis was suppressed compared with radiotherapy alone. In particular, the LDDS group achieved a high tumor-suppressive effect with T cell-mediated immune activity, indicating the efficacy of LDDS in radioimmunotherapy.

Indexed as

CTLA-4 AntigenDrug Delivery SystemsRadioimmunotherapyAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBone NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyLymph NodesMiceOsteosarcomaXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntibodies, MonoclonalCTLA-4 AntigenImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsanti‐CTLA‐4 antibodyimmune checkpoint inhibitorimmune‐related adverse eventslymphatic drug delivery systemradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39380185
PMCPMC11611777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.