ArticleMolecular oncology2024
Transformer-based representation learning and multiple-instance learning for cancer diagnosis exclusively from raw sequencing fragments of bisulfite-treated plasma cell-free DNA.
Article in Molecular oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applying transformer-based deep learning models in image-driven cancer diagnosis: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global research trends.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- DNAmBERT: a transformer-based model for non-invasive cancer diagnosis using DNA sequence and methylation data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- From multi-omics to deep learning: advances in cfDNA-based liquid biopsy for multi-cancer screening.Biomarker research · 2025Review
- Circulating Cell-free DNA Fragmentomics Detection and Beyond.Aging and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early cancer diagnosis from bisulfite-treated cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragments requires tedious data analytical procedures. Here, we present a deep-learning-based approach for early cancer interception and diagnosis (DECIDIA) that can achieve accurate cancer diagnosis exclusively from bisulfite-treated cfDNA sequencing fragments. DECIDIA relies on transformer-based representation learning of DNA fragments and weakly supervised multiple-instance learning for classification. We systematically evaluate the performance of DECIDIA for cancer diagnosis and cancer type prediction on a curated dataset of 5389 samples that consist of colorectal cancer (CRC; n = 1574), hepatocellular cell carcinoma (HCC; n = 1181), lung cancer (n = 654), and non-cancer control (n = 1980). DECIDIA achieved an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.980 (95% CI, 0.976-0.984) in 10-fold cross-validation settings on the CRC dataset by differentiating cancer patients from cancer-free controls, outperforming benchmarked methods that are based on methylation intensities. Noticeably, DECIDIA achieved an AUROC of 0.910 (95% CI, 0.896-0.924) on the externally independent HCC testing set in distinguishing HCC patients from cancer-free controls, although there was no HCC data used in model development. In the settings of cancer-type classification, we observed that DECIDIA achieved a micro-average AUROC of 0.963 (95% CI, 0.960-0.966) and an overall accuracy of 82.8% (95% CI, 81.8-83.9). In addition, we distilled four sequence signatures from the raw sequencing reads that exhibited differential patterns in cancer versus control and among different cancer types. Our approach represents a new paradigm towards eliminating the tedious data analytical procedures for liquid biopsy that uses bisulfite-treated cfDNA methylome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.