ArticleJournal of intensive care2024
Effects of normal saline versus lactated Ringer's solution on organ function and inflammatory responses to heatstroke in rats.
Article in Journal of intensive care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of Cooling Blankets and Cold Fluid Infusions in Classic Heatstroke Treatment: A Controlled Study in Rats.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Developing a molecular diagnostic model for heatstroke-induced coagulopathy: a proteomics and metabolomics approach.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHeatstroke is a life-threatening condition characterized by severe hyperthermia and multiple organ dysfunction. Both normal saline (NS) and lactated Ringer's solution (LR) are commonly used for cooling and volume resuscitation in heatstroke patients; however, their specific impacts on patient outcomes during heatstroke management are poorly understood. Given that the systemic inflammatory response and multiple-organ damage caused by heat toxicity are the main pathophysiological features of heatstroke, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of NS and LR on the production of inflammatory cytokines and the functional and structural integrity of renal and cardiac tissues in a rat model of heatstroke.
methodsFifty-five male Sprague‒Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups: cold NS or LR infusion postheatstroke (4 ℃, 4 ml/100 g, over 10 min) and NS or LR infusion without heatstroke induction (control groups). Vital signs, arterial blood gases, inflammatory cytokines, and renal and cardiac function indicators, such as serum creatinine and cTnI, were monitored after treatment. Tissue samples were analysed via HE staining, electron microscopy, and fluorescence staining for apoptosis markers, and protein lysates were used for Western blotting of pyroptosis-related proteins.
resultsCompared with LR-treated heatstroke rats, NS-treated heatstroke rats presented lower mean arterial pressures, worsened metabolic acidosis, and higher levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in both the serum and tissue. These rats also presented increased serum creatinine, troponin, catecholamines, and NGAL and reduced renal clearance. Histological and ultrastructural analyses revealed more severe tissue damage in NS-treated rats, with increased apoptosis and increased expression of NLRP3/caspase-1/GSDMD signalling molecules. Similar differences were not observed between the control groups receiving either NS or LR infusion. One NS-treated heatstroke rat died within 24 h, whereas all the LR-treated and control rats survived.
conclusionsNS resuscitation in heat-exposed rats significantly promotes metabolic acidosis and the inflammatory response, leading to greater functional and structural organ damage than does LR. These findings underscore the necessity of selecting appropriate resuscitation fluids for heatstroke management to minimize organ damage and improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.