Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39379999›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2024

Optimizing and benchmarking polygenic risk scores with GWAS summary statistics.

Zijie Zhao, Tim Gruenloh, Meiyi Yan, Yixuan Wu, Zhongxuan Sun, Jiacheng Miao, Yuchang Wu, Jie Song, Qiongshi Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Polygenic prediction of treatment efficacy with causal transfer learning.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Task-Agnostic Machine-Learning-Assisted Inference.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zijie ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Tim GruenlohDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Meiyi YanDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Yixuan WuDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Zhongxuan SunDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Jiacheng MiaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Yuchang WuDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Jie SongCenter for Demography of Health and Aging, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Qiongshi LuDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. qlu@biostat.wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4514-0969

Funding

Statistical Data Enclave CoreP30AG017266 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Michal Engelman · 1999 to 2026
$17.0M
Linking Variants to Multi-scale Phenotypes via a Synthesis of Subnetwork Inference and Deep LearningU01HG012039 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Mark W. Craven · 2021 to 2026
$3.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG012039NIA NIH HHS P30 AG017266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolygenic risk score (PRS) is a major research topic in human genetics. However, a significant gap exists between PRS methodology and applications in practice due to often unavailable individual-level data for various PRS tasks including model fine-tuning, benchmarking, and ensemble learning.

resultsWe introduce an innovative statistical framework to optimize and benchmark PRS models using summary statistics of genome-wide association studies. This framework builds upon our previous work and can fine-tune virtually all existing PRS models while accounting for linkage disequilibrium. In addition, we provide an ensemble learning strategy named PUMAS-ensemble to combine multiple PRS models into an ensemble score without requiring external data for model fitting. Through extensive simulations and analysis of many complex traits in the UK Biobank, we demonstrate that this approach closely approximates gold-standard analytical strategies based on external validation, and substantially outperforms state-of-the-art PRS methods.

conclusionsOur method is a powerful and general modeling technique that can continue to combine the best-performing PRS methods out there through ensemble learning and could become an integral component for all future PRS applications.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingGenome-Wide Association StudyMultifactorial InheritanceGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic Risk ScoreHumansLinkage DisequilibriumModels, GeneticEnsemble learningGenome-wide association studyGWAS summary statisticsPolygenic risk scorePRS benchmarkPRS model-tuning

Identifiers

PMID39379999
PMCPMC11462675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.