ArticleBMC cancer2024
Impact of systemic steroids on the efficacy of first line imatinib treatment of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective management of adverse events is required to maintain sufficient imatinib dosing when treating patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Skin rash is a common adverse event of imatinib, which can be effectively controlled by systemic steroid treatment without imatinib dose modification or interruption. However, the impact of the use of systemic steroids on the efficacy of imatinib treatment remains unclear.
methodsBetween October 2014 and February 2022, 277 consecutive patients from a prospective registry of GIST patients were included as the study population. Patients who started systemic steroids due to grade ≥ 3 skin rash or grade 2 skin rash with grade 2 pruritis were classified as the steroid group, whereas patients who did not develop a skin rash or those who did not require steroids for a mild skin rash were classified as the control group. Efficacy outcomes were compared between the two groups.
resultsAmong the 277 patients, 30 (10.8%) were treated with systemic steroids for skin rash. There was no significant difference in progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between the steroid and control groups (3-year PFS, 67.7% vs. 65.1%, p = 0.53; 3-year OS, 91% vs. 89.9%, p = 0.67, respectively). The use of systemic steroids was not an independent factor associated with PFS (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.36-1.49, p = 0.39) and OS (hazard ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.12-1.18, p = 0.09). In the steroid group, patients who successfully maintained the imatinib dosage showed a trend toward more favorable survival outcomes than those who did not (3-year PFS, 73.3% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.34; 3-year OS, 95.8% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.15, respectively).
conclusionsThe use of systemic steroids for the control of imatinib induced severe skin rash did not adversely affect the efficacy outcomes of imatinib in patients with advanced GIST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.