ArticleBMC neurology2024
Convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage revealed contralateral internal carotid artery dissection due to Eagle syndrome: a case report.
Article in BMC neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtraumatic localized convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage (cSAH) is an uncommon form of nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage characterized by bleeding limited to the cerebral convexities. Ipsilateral cSAH can result from a variety of causes, such as internal carotid artery stenosis, obstruction, and dissection, although concomitant contralateral cSAH is exceptionally rare. In this case, the initial findings of cSAH led us to discovering contralateral internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD) and an elongated styloid process (ESP). ESP is recognized as a risk factor for ICAD, which is a hallmark of Eagle syndrome. This sequence of findings led to the diagnosis of Eagle syndrome, illustrating a complex and intriguing interplay between cerebrovascular conditions and anatomical variations. CASE PRESENTATION: A 47-year-old Japanese woman experienced acute onset of headache radiating to her neck, reaching its zenith approximately two hours after onset. Given the intractable nature of the headache and its persistence for three days, she presented to the emergency department. Neurological examination revealed no abnormalities, and the coagulation screening parameters were within normal ranges. Brain computed tomography (CT) revealed right parietal cSAH, while CT angiography (CTA) revealed ICAD and an ESP measuring 30.1 mm on the left side, positioned only 1.4 mm from the dissected artery. The unusual occurrence of contralateral cSAH prompted extensive and repeated imaging reviews that excluded reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), leading to a diagnosis of left ICAD secondary to Eagle syndrome. The patient underwent conservative management, and the dissected ICA spontaneously resolved. The patient has remained recurrence-free for two and a half years.
conclusionsManaging cSAH requires diligent investigation for ICAD, extending beyond its identification to explore underlying causes. Recognizing Eagle syndrome, though rare, as a potential etiology of ICAD necessitates the importance of evaluating ESPs. The method for preventing recurrent cervical artery dissection due to Eagle syndrome is controversial; however, conservative management is a viable option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.