ReviewNeurocritical care2025
Which Intravenous Isotonic Fluid Offers Better Outcomes for Patients with a Brain Injury?
Review in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the effects of Plasma-Lyte 148 or 0.9% saline on acid-base balance in patients undergoing neurosurgery: a randomized clinical trial.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Trial
- Resuscitation and Initial Management After Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Questions for the On-Call Shift.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Administering intravenous fluids is a common therapy for critically ill patients. Isotonic crystalloid solutions, such as saline or balanced solutions, are frequently used for intravenous fluid therapy. The choice between saline or a balanced crystalloid has been a significant question in critical care medicine. Recent large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated whether balanced crystalloids yield better outcomes in general or specific critical care populations, and many of them have confirmed this hypothesis. Although the broad eligibility criteria of these RCTs suggest applicability to neurocritical care patients, it is important to discuss whether using balanced crystalloids, as opposed to saline, would benefit patients who primarily have neurological disorders or diseases. This review considers the relevance of this question, weighs the pros and cons of the two fluid types, examines available data, and anticipates results from ongoing RCTs to guide clinicians in selecting the optimal fluid for patients with brain injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39379751What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.