ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024
Deep learning model using planar whole-body bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of skull base invasion in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of CNN models for nasopharyngeal carcinoma classification on pathology data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- BSc-DARTS: Neural Architecture Search for Automatic Diagnosis of Bone Metastases in Bone ScintigramsCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- MRI-based model for individualized prediction of skull bone destruction and EBV DNA-related risk stratification in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- An interpretable machine learning model for predicting bone marrow invasion in patients with lymphoma viaBMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Exploring the prognostic value of EBV DNA in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy using AI-based modeling.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study assesses the reliability of deep learning models based on planar whole-body bone scintigraphy for diagnosing Skull base invasion (SBI) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients.
methodsIn this multicenter study, a deep learning model was developed using data from one center with a 7:3 allocation to training and internal test sets, to diagnose SBI in patients newly diagnosed with NPC using planar whole-body bone scintigraphy. Patients were diagnosed based on a composite reference standard incorporating radiologic and follow-up data. Ten different convolutional neural network (CNN) models were applied to both whole-image and partial-image input modes to determine the optimal model for each analysis. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, decision curve analysis (DCA), and compared with expert assessments by two nuclear medicine physicians.
resultsThe best-performing model using partial-body input achieved AUCs of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.86) in the internal test set, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.91) in the external cohort, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.83) in the treatment test cohort. Calibration curves and DCA confirmed the models' excellent discrimination, calibration, and potential clinical utility across internal and external datasets. The AUCs of both nuclear medicine physicians were lower than those of the best-performing deep learning model in external test set (AUC: 0.75 vs. 0.77 vs. 0.84).
conclusionDeep learning models utilizing partial-body input from planar whole-body bone scintigraphy demonstrate high discriminatory power for diagnosing SBI in NPC patients, surpassing experienced nuclear medicine physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.