Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39379742›Full record

ArticleCVIR endovascular2024

Outcome of tailored antiplatelet therapy in carotid stenting: a retrospective comparative study.

Pavol Vigláš, Vojtěch Smolka, Jan Raupach, Aleš Hejčl, David Černík, Filip Cihlář

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CVIR endovascular, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pavol ViglášDeptartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3380-0368
Vojtěch SmolkaDeptartment of Radiology, Masaryk hospital - J.E. Purkinje University and KZ a .s., Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic.
Jan RaupachDeptartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. jan.raupach@fnhk.cz.
Aleš HejčlDepartment of Neurosurgery Masaryk Hospital -J.E. Purkinje University and KZ a.s., Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic.
David ČerníkDeptartment of Neurology, Masaryk Hospital - Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic.
Filip CihlářDeptartment of Radiology, Masaryk hospital - J.E. Purkinje University and KZ a .s., Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarotid stenting requires dual antiplatelet therapy to effectively prevent thromboembolic complications. However, resistance to clopidogrel, a key component of this therapy, may lead to persistent risk of these complications. The aim of this study was to determine, if the implementation of routine platelet function testing and adjusting therapy was associated with lower incidence of thromboembolic complications and death.

methodsAll consecutive patients treated with carotid artery stenting in a single institution over 8 years were enlisted in a retrospective study. Platelet function testing was performed, and efficient antiplatelet therapy was set before the procedure. Incidence of procedure-related stroke or death within periprocedural period (0-30 days) was assessed. The results were evaluated in relation to the findings of six prominent randomized control trials.

resultsA total of 241 patients were treated for carotid stenosis, seven patients undergo CAS on both sides over time. There was 138 symptomatic (55,6%) and 110 asymptomatic stenoses (44,4%). Five thromboembolic complications (2,01%) occurred, four of them (1,61%) was procedure-related. Two patients died because of procedure-related stroke (0,82%). Incidence of procedure-related stroke or death was significant lower compared to the results of CREST study (2,01% vs. 4,81%, P = 0,0243) in the entire cohorts, and to the results of ICSS study in the symptomatic cohorts (2,86% vs. 7,37%, P = 0,0243), respectively.

conclusionsTailored antiplatelet therapy in carotid stenting is safe and seems to be related with lower incidence of procedure-related death or stroke rate. Larger prospective studies to assess whether platelet function testing-guided antiplatelet therapy is superior to standard dual antiplatelet should be considered.

Indexed as

Antiplatelet therapyCarotid stenosisCarotid stenting

Identifiers

PMID39379742
PMCPMC11461431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.