Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39379691›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2024

Consequences of trisomy 21 for brain development in Down syndrome.

Matthew L Russo, André M M Sousa, Anita Bhattacharyya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development of Molecular Neuropathology in Down Syndrome across the Lifespan.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Black gas, bright future: HNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  14. Accelerated Tempo of Cortical Neurogenesis in Down Syndrome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Single-nucleus analysis reveals oxidative stress in Down syndrome basal forebrain neurons at birth.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew L RussoWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0340-3038
André M M SousaWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1740-5066
Anita BhattacharyyaWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. bhattacharyy@waisman.wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0360-7145

Funding

A Multidisciplinary Center for Developing Human and Non-human Primate Brain Cell AtlasesUM1MH130991 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Hao Huang, ARNOLD KRIEGSTEIN · 2022 to 2026
$25.2M
WISCONSIN CENTER ON MENTAL RETARDATION: CORE SUPPORTP30HD003352 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SVAREN, JOHN P · 1985 to 2015
$25.2M
Supplement to TR01 Human cortical development and neural plasticity altered by trisomy 21R01HD106197 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BHATTACHARYYA, ANITA, ZHANG, SU-CHUN · 2021 to 2025
$11.4M
Waisman Center Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterP50HD105353 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Qiang Chang · 2021 to 2026
$8.5M
Trisomy 21 and its impact on hedgehog-dependent gene regulation and differentiation timingR01HD111938 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Ivan Paul Moskowitz · 2023 to 2026
$6.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD003352NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105353NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD106197NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD111938NIMH NIH HHS UM1 MH130991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The appearance of cognitive deficits and altered brain morphology in newborns with Down syndrome (DS) suggests that these features are driven by disruptions at the earliest stages of brain development. Despite its high prevalence and extensively characterized cognitive phenotypes, relatively little is known about the cellular and molecular mechanisms that drive the changes seen in DS. Recent technical advances, such as single-cell omics and the development of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) models of DS, now enable in-depth analyses of the biochemical and molecular drivers of altered brain development in DS. Here, we review the current state of knowledge on brain development in DS, focusing primarily on data from human post-mortem brain tissue. We explore the biological mechanisms that have been proposed to lead to intellectual disability in DS, assess the extent to which data from studies using iPSC models supports these hypotheses, and identify current gaps in the field.

Indexed as

BrainDown SyndromeInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID39379691
PMCPMC11834940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.