ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Analysis of the association between immune-related adverse events and the effectiveness in patients with advanced non-small-cell-lung cancer.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial Influence on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Non-Small Cell Carcinoma: The Gut-Lung-Immune Axis.Cancers · 2026Review
- Immune-related adverse events in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma with immune checkpoint inhibitors.British journal of haematology · 2026Observational
- Comparative predictive value of immunotherapy biomarkers: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Unveiling the global research status and intellectual map of cancer and immunosuppressants.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved lung cancer treatment but are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study analyzes the relationship between irAEs and treatment effectiveness in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of NSCLC patients treated with ICIs from March 2019 to October 2022 at Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen). Patients were divided into irAE and non-irAE groups, and treatment outcomes were compared.
resultsA total of 154 patients were included, with 36.4% in the irAE group and 63.6% in the non-irAE group. Most irAEs were Grade 1-2 (86.4%), with 13.6% being Grade 3 or higher. The irAE group had higher disease control rates (DCR: 94.6% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.004) and objective response rates (ORR: 42.9% vs. 26.5%, P = 0.037). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the irAE group (18 vs. 9 months, HR: 0.53, P = 0.001), as was overall survival (OS: 39.5 vs. 16 months, HR: 0.46, P = 0.001). Landmark analysis at 6 and 12 weeks confirmed that irAEs were associated with improved outcomes. Moreover, patients who experienced two or more adverse events during treatment had significantly longer OS compared to those who had only one or no adverse events (41.6 months vs. 34.0 vs. 23.6, P = 0.003).
conclusionPatients with irAEs demonstrated better outcomes, including ORR, DCR, PFS, and OS. Further studies on biomarkers and irAE incidence are warranted to improve lung cancer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.