Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39379627›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2025

Early prediction of mortality and morbidities in VLBW preterm neonates using machine learning.

Chi-Hung Shu, Rema Zebda, Camilo Espinosa, Jonathan Reiss, Anne Debuyserie, Kristina Reber, Nima Aghaeepour, Mohan Pammi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Research progress in artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and management of diseases in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Artificial intelligence-guided nutritional therapy in the ICU.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chi-Hung Shu *Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Rema Zebda *Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Camilo EspinosaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jonathan ReissDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Anne DebuyserieDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Kristina ReberDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Nima AghaeepourDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Mohan PammiDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. mohanv@bcm.edu.

Funding

Machine Learning and Multiomics for Predictive Models and Biomarker Discovery in Preterm Infants.R01HD112886 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Mohan Pammi · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
Machine Learning for Integrative Modeling of the Immune System in Clinical SettingsR35GM138353 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI AGHAEEPOUR, NIMA · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
Gates Foundation INV-037517NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD112886NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting mortality and specific morbidities before they occur may allow for interventions that may improve health trajectories. HYPOTHESIS: Integrating key maternal and postnatal infant variables in the first 2 weeks of age into machine learning (ML) algorithms will reliably predict survival and specific morbidities in VLBW preterm infants.

methodsML algorithms were developed to integrate 47 features for predicting mortality, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), neonatal sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), cystic periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). A retrospective cohort (n = 3341) was used to train and validate the models with a repeated 10-fold cross-validation strategy. These models were then tested on a separate cohort (n = 447) to evaluate the final model performance.

resultsAmong the seven ML algorithms employed, tree-based ensemble models, specifically Random Forest (RF) and XGBoost, had the best performance metrics. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of sepsis with or without meningitis (0.73), NEC (0.73), BPD (0.71), and mortality (0.74) exceeded 0.7, while the area under Precision-Recall curve (AUPRC) for all outcomes was greater than the prevalence, demonstrating effective risk stratification in VLBW preterm infants.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates the potential of predictive analytics leveraging ML techniques in advancing precision medicine. IMPACT: Reliable prediction of adverse outcomes before they occur has the potential to institute interventions and possibly improve health trajectories in VLBW preterm infants. We used machine learning to develop and test predictive models for mortality and five major morbidities in VLBW preterm infants. Individualized prediction of outcomes and individualized interventions will advance Precision Medicine in Neonatology.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityInfant, Premature, DiseasesInfant, Very Low Birth WeightMachine LearningAlgorithmsBronchopulmonary DysplasiaEnterocolitis, NecrotizingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleMorbidityRetrospective StudiesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID39379627
PMCPMC12249422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.