ArticleGenes and immunity2024
A potential coagulation-related diagnostic model associated with immune infiltration for acute myocardial infarction.
Article in Genes and immunity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Infusible Extracellular Matrix Biomaterial Enhances Cell-Specific Pro-Repair Responses Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Infusible Extracellular Matrix Biomaterial Enhances Cell-Specific Pro-Repair Responses Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Current Perspectives on GLP-1 Agonists in Contemporary Clinical Practice from Science and Mechanistic Foundations To Optimal Translation.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The production of pro-coagulation factors can affect the development and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The clinical value of coagulation-related genes (CRGs) was investigated to discover new targets for diagnosing and treating AMI. We screened 335 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between AMI and healthy individuals based on the GSE66360 dataset. We took the intersection of the obtained DEGs with 139 CRGs. Finally, 10 differentially expressed CEGs were screened out. The random forest algorithm was constructed to identify 6 signature CRGs (THBS1, SERPINA1, THBD, MMP9, MAFF, and PLAU). Subsequently, the established predictive model was found to have good diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.9694 in the training cohort [GSE66360 dataset] and 0.9076 in the external validation cohort [GSE48060 dataset]). Consensus clustering identified the CRG clusters, and the accuracy of the grouping was verified. We found that AMI patients can be divided into two distinct subgroups based on the differentially expressed CRGs. Immune cell infiltration level was consistent with the expression levels of CRGs based on single sample gene set enrichment analysis. These findings reveal the potential role of CRGs in AMI. Characterizing the coagulation features of AMI patients can help in the risk stratification of patients and provide personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39379556What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.