ArticleScientific reports2024
Research on an identification model for mine water inrush sources based on the HBA-CatBoost algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and efficient identification of water inrush sources, as one of the three critical elements of mine water hazards, is crucial for mine water management. To identify the sources of mine water inrush effectively, a model named HBA-CatBoost is introduced. This model is established on the hybrid bat algorithm (HBA)-optimized category feature gradient boosting tree (CatBoost), and the shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method is employed to elucidate the model's decision-making process. Given the prevalent occurrence of water hazards in coal seam roofs and floors in the northern Guizhou coalfield, coupled with the challenges in pinpointing water inrush sources in mines, the HBA-CatBoost model is tested at the Longfeng Coal Mine in northern Guizhou to validate its practicality. Comparative analysis with the HBA-RF, HBA-XGBoost, CatBoost, RF, and XGBoost models demonstrates that the hybrid bat algorithm significantly enhances the classification performance of the CatBoost model, resulting in improved convergence speed and classification accuracy. The HBA-CatBoost model outperforms the aforementioned models in terms of classification effectiveness, achieving accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 scores of 96.43%, 97.22%, 96.43%, and 96.61%, respectively. The SHAP method elucidates the decision mechanism of the optimal HBA-CatBoost model, highlighting the significance of sample features and bolstering the model's credibility. These outcomes underscore the superior performance of the HBA-CatBoost model and its potential for effectively identifying water inrush sources in mines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.