ArticleScientific reports2024
Cognitive-motor interference in people with essential tremor.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adapting to different environments throughout daily activities requires flexibility in allocating attention. Compromised dual-tasking can hinder mobility, increase fall risk, and decrease functional independence in patients with essential tremor, who exhibit both mobility and cognitive impairments. We evaluated motor and cognitive dual-task effects and task prioritization in 15 people with Essential Tremor (ET) and 15 age-matched people without ET during a standard and more challenging water-carry TUG. Task-specific interference was evaluated by calculating motor and cognitive dual-task effects, whereas task prioritization was assessed by contrasting the cognitive dual-task effect with the motor dual-task effect. The simultaneous performance of two tasks did not differentially impact motor or cognitive performance in either group, and both groups prioritized cognitive task performance in standard and water-carry TUG assessments. This study enhances our understanding of motor-cognitive interactions in individuals with essential tremor. These insights could lead to patient-centered approaches to therapy to improve functional performance in dynamic daily environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.