ArticleScientific reports2024
Development and transfer learning of self-attention model for major adverse cardiovascular events prediction across hospitals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-cohort Generalization for Heart Disease Prediction with Explainable AI.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Article
- Sustainable and interpretable heart disease prediction: a clinical decision support approach for biomedical healthcare applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A hybrid deep learning and large language model framework for MACE risk prediction and evidence-based clinical recommendations.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Pre-trained Artificial Intelligence Models in the Prediction and Classification of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2025Article
- Towards a prescribing monitoring system for medication safety evaluation within electronic health records: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Developing RxNorm Extension: A Step Toward Global Drug Data Harmonization in Observational Drug Research.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) is crucial due to its high readmission rate and severe sequelae. Current risk scoring model of MACE are based on a few features of a patient status at a single time point. We developed a self-attention-based model to predict MACE within 3 years from time series data utilizing numerous features in electronic medical records (EMRs). In addition, we demonstrated transfer learning for hospitals with insufficient data through code mapping and feature selection by the calculated importance using Xgboost. We established operational definitions and categories for diagnoses, medications, and laboratory tests to streamline scattered codes, enhancing clinical interpretability across hospitals. This resulted in reduced feature size and improved data quality for transfer learning. The pre-trained model demonstrated an increase in AUROC after transfer learning, from 0.564 to 0.821. Furthermore, to validate the effectiveness of the predicted scores, we analyzed the data using traditional survival analysis, which confirmed an elevated hazard ratio for a group with high scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.