Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39379430›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Remote detection of water stress in cotton using a center pivot irrigation system-mounted sensor package.

Bala R Sapkota, Curtis B Adams, Qiong Su, Srinivasulu Ale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bala R SapkotaDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, 370 Olsen Blvd, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Curtis B AdamsUSDA Agricultural Research Service, Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center, 48037 Tubbs Ranch Road, Adams, OR, 97810, USA. curtis.b.adams@usda.gov.
Qiong SuDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Clemson University, 232 McAdams Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Srinivasulu AleTexas A&M AgriLife Research, , 11708 Hwy. 70 South, Vernon, TX, 76384, USA.

Funding

Cotton Incorporated 17-519TX
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much research has been invested in infrared temperature (IRT)-based methods for cotton (Gossypium hirsutism L.) water stress detection using in-field sensors, but adoption of these is low, perhaps due to logistical challenges. Alternatively, the Water Deficit Index (WDI) was developed for crop water stress assessment using remote sensors not embedded in the canopy. The objective of this research was to evaluate the performance of a sensor package-including modern IRT and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) sensors facing downward at 45˚, and a mini weather station-attached unintrusively to a center pivot irrigation system for detecting cotton water stress using WDI. Sensor packages were evaluated in a two-year field study that included four irrigation treatments (0, 30, 60, and 90% ET replacement) and in two production cotton fields. Overall, the tested system was effective at distinguishing crop water stress among irrigation rates. Comparison of the results to a ground-based station and simulations indicated that WDI overestimated water stress at the highest irrigation rate, but performed well otherwise. Accuracy of the system could be improved by measuring canopy coverage (Fc) from the same vantage point as the IRT and NDVI sensors (from the pivot, downward at a 45˚ angle).

Indexed as

Crop water stress indexDSSATInfrared temperature sensorNormalized difference vegetation indexUnmanned aircraft systemsWater deficit index

Identifiers

PMID39379430
PMCPMC11461539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.