ArticleScientific reports2024
Enhancing pectus excavatum diagnosis with an automated batch evaluation tool for chest computed tomography images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Modified Haller Index to a Novel Patented Anatomical Measurement Device: Engineering Development, Validation, and Clinical Applications of Non-Invasive Thoracic Morphometry.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to implement a fully automatic computed tomography (CT) image-detection programming algorithm as a pectus excavatum (PE) diagnostic tool, facilitating comprehensive chest wall deformity evaluation. We developed our algorithm using MATLAB, leveraging the Hounsfield unit threshold and region growing methods. The MATLAB graphical user interface enables the direct use of our program. We validated the model using CT images of anthropomorphic phantoms and one normal individual. The measurement values obtained by our algorithm demonstrated very small differences compared to the known anthropomorphic phantom model data and manual measurement. For algorithm testing, 17,214 chest CT scans obtained from 57 PE patients were processed by the algorithm and independently reviewed by a radiologist and a thoracic surgeon. The measurements of transverse, anteroposterior, and sternum-to-vertebral distance of the thoracic cavity, along with the calculated data of four indices, exhibited high positive correlations (0.94-0.99). The asymmetry index and maximum anteroposterior hemithorax distance exhibited moderate correlation (0.40-0.83). Our automatic PE diagnostic tool demonstrated high accuracy; four chest wall deformity indices were obtained simultaneously without any initial manual marking, correlating well with manual measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.