ArticleNPJ breast cancer2024
Discerning the impact of ctDNA detection on patient decision-making in early-stage breast cancer.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The impact of knowledge of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status on patient decisions in high-risk triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) weighing benefit and toxicity is unknown. Here, 286 women with a history of non-metastatic breast cancer who had received chemotherapy completed a survey mimicking scenarios of residual TNBC after chemotherapy and unknown, negative, or positive ctDNA status to determine the shift in the decision to receive adjuvant therapy. Participants were then presented scenarios mimicking possible post-neoadjuvant therapies and rated acceptability. A general linear model with repeated measures determined contributions of risk reduction and toxicity. When the hypothetical risk of recurrence mimicked ctDNA negativity, significantly less participants were accepting of adjuvant capecitabine versus no therapy. When presented with ctDNA positivity and increased recurrence risk, the degree of benefit impacted acceptability more than the toxicity profile. As genomic technology advances and ctDNA assays become commercially available, it is imperative to understand the impact on patient decision-making.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.