Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39379153›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Encoding of Vibrotactile Stimuli by Mechanoreceptors in Rodent Glabrous Skin.

Laura Medlock, Dhekra Al-Basha, Adel Halawa, Christopher Dedek, Stéphanie Ratté, Steven A Prescott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Spinal Processing of Spatiotemporally Diverse Tactile Stimuli: Computational Insights into Allodynia and Spinal Cord Stimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Survey of temporal coding of sensory information.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura MedlockNeurosciences and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8986-1805
Dhekra Al-BashaNeurosciences and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7842-5517
Adel HalawaNeurosciences and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4783-6246
Christopher DedekNeurosciences and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3526-1257
Stéphanie RattéNeurosciences and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7005-6726
Steven A PrescottNeurosciences and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A4, Canada steve.prescott@sickkids.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-3827-4512

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatosensory coding in rodents has been mostly studied in the whisker system and hairy skin, whereas the function of low-threshold mechanoreceptors (LTMRs) in the rodent glabrous skin has received scant attention, unlike in primates where the glabrous skin has been the focus. The relative activation of different LTMR subtypes carries information about vibrotactile stimuli, as does the rate and temporal patterning of LTMR spikes. Rate coding depends on the probability of a spike occurring on each stimulus cycle (reliability), whereas temporal coding depends on the timing of spikes relative to the stimulus cycle (precision). Using in vivo extracellular recordings in male rats and mice of either sex, we measured the reliability and precision of LTMR responses to tactile stimuli including sustained pressure and vibration. Similar to other species, rodent LTMRs were separated into rapid-adapting (RA) or slow-adapting based on their response to sustained pressure. However, unlike the dichotomous frequency preference characteristic of RA1 and RA2/Pacinian afferents in other species, rodent RAs fell along a continuum. Fitting generalized linear models to experimental data reproduced the reliability and precision of rodent RAs. The resulting model parameters highlight key mechanistic differences across the RA spectrum; specifically, the integration window of different RAs transitions from wide to narrow as tuning preferences across the population move from low to high frequencies. Our results show that rodent RAs can support both rate and temporal coding, but their heterogeneity suggests that coactivation patterns play a greater role in population coding than for dichotomously tuned primate RAs.

Indexed as

MechanoreceptorsPhysical StimulationTouchVibrationAction PotentialsAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySkinmechanoreceptorsrodentsomatosensationtactile codingtouchvibrotactile

Identifiers

PMID39379153
PMCPMC11561868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.