Observational studyThe British journal of ophthalmology2025
Vitreoretinal lymphoma: the importance of cerebral spinal fluid evaluation at initial diagnosis.
Observational study in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intraocular Lymphoma: A Review.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsTo determine if patients with vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) and concomitant central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) may present without brain MRI findings, but possess cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) suspicious for lymphoma.
methodsThis was a retrospective, single-centre, observational study evaluating patients with a diagnosis or suspicion of VRL seen at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2006 and 2024. Patients were included if the final diagnosis was biopsy-proven CNSL and both MRI brain with and without contrast±CSF evaluation (obligatory for inclusion if MRI negative) were performed at the initial diagnostic workup. Patients were excluded if CNS disease treatment (brain, spine or CSF) preceded ocular disease. Patients with prior extra-CNS disease were included. Clinical records and radiographic imaging were retrospectively reviewed and relevant data were recorded for each patient. We evaluated the proportion of patients with MRI negative and CSF suspicious for lymphoma. Subgroup analysis included imaging features, pathology, treatment and disease course.
resultsWe identified 65 patients. Of the 65 patients at the presentation of VRL, 30 had negative MRI brain and CSF, 16 had positive brain MRI and negative CSF and 8 had both positive MRI brain and CSF. 11 (16.9%) had CSF suspicious for lymphoma without positive findings on MRI of the brain. In this subgroup, the median age was 66 years (range 49-82) and 36% were female. 86% of these patients were asymptomatic neurologically. 73% underwent systemic treatment. At a mean 3 years follow-up, 91% of patients were living.
conclusionIn patients with suspected VRL, it is possible to have CSF test positive for lymphoma in the context of negative brain MRI. This suggests, when evaluating VRL patients for concomitant CNS disease, CSF evaluation leads to earlier detection and systemic treatment, even when MRI brain findings are negative. In our cohort, an absence of CSF evaluation in the context of negative brain MRI could have missed 16.9% of patients with CNS lymphoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.