Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39378891›Full record

Observational studyThe Lancet. Microbe2024

Exploring uncatalogued genetic variation in antimicrobial resistance gene families in Escherichia coli: an observational analysis.

Samuel Lipworth, Derrick Crook, A Sarah Walker, Tim Peto, Nicole Stoesser

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Lancet. Microbe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Deciphering the Implications ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Draft genome sequence of soil isolateMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel LipworthNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: samuel.lipworth@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Derrick CrookNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at University of Oxford in partnership with UKHSA, Oxford, UK.
A Sarah WalkerNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at University of Oxford in partnership with UKHSA, Oxford, UK.
Tim PetoNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Nicole StoesserNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at University of Oxford in partnership with UKHSA, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR200915Medical Research Council MR/T001151/1Wellcome Trust 203141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Escherichia coli is a global problem associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. AMR-associated genes are typically annotated based on similarity to variants in a curated reference database, with the implicit assumption that uncatalogued genetic variation within these is phenotypically unimportant. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the AMRFinder tool and, subsequently, the potential for discovering new AMR-associated gene families and characterising variation within existing ones to improve genotype-to-susceptibility phenotype predictions in E coli.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study of international genome sequence data, we assembled a global dataset of 9001 E coli sequences from five publicly available data collections predominantly deriving from human bloodstream infections from: Norway, Oxfordshire (UK), Thailand, the UK, and Sweden. 8555 of these sequences had linked antibiotic susceptibility data. Raw reads were assembled using Shovill and AMR genes (relevant to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and trimethoprim) extracted using the National Center for Biotechnology Information AMRFinder tool (using both default and strict [100%] coverage and identity filters). We assessed the predictive value of the presence of these genes for predicting resistance or susceptibility against US Food and Drug Administration thresholds for major and very major errors. Mash was used to calculate the similarity between extracted genes using Jaccard distances. We empirically reclustered extracted gene sequences into AMR-associated gene families (≥70% match) and antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs; 100% match) and categorised these according to their frequency in the dataset. Accumulation curves were simulated and correlations between gene frequency in the Oxfordshire and other datasets calculated using the Spearman coefficient. Firth regression was used to model the association between the presence of bla

findingsThe performance of the AMRFinder database for genotype-to-phenotype predictions using strict 100% identity and coverage thresholds did not meet US Food and Drug Administration thresholds for any of the seven antibiotics evaluated. Relaxing filters to default settings improved sensitivity with a specificity cost. For all antibiotics, most explainable resistance was associated with the presence of a small number of genes. There was a proportion of resistance that could not be explained by known ARGs; this ranged from 75·1% for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid to 3·4% for ciprofloxacin. Only 18 199 (51·5%) of the 35 343 ARGs detected had a 100% identity and coverage match in the AMRFinder database. After empirically reclassifying genes at 100% nucleotide sequence identity, we identified 1042 unique ARGs, of which 126 (12·1%) were present ten times or more, 313 (30·0%) were present between two and nine times, and 603 (57·9%) were present only once. Simulated accumulation curves revealed that discovery of new (100% match) ARGs present more than once in the dataset plateaued relatively quickly, whereas new singleton ARGs were discovered even after many thousands of isolates had been included. We identified a strong correlation (Spearman coefficient 0·76 [95% CI 0·73-0·80], p<0·0001) between the number of times an ARG was observed in Oxfordshire and the number of times it was seen internationally, with ARGs that were observed six times in Oxfordshire always being found elsewhere. Finally, using the example of bla

interpretationWe highlight substantial uncatalogued genetic variation with respect to known ARGs, although a relatively small proportion of these alleles are repeatedly observed in a large international dataset suggesting strong selection pressures. The current approach of using fuzzy matching for ARG detection, ignoring the unknown effects of uncatalogued variation, is unlikely to be acceptable for future clinical deployment. The association of synonymous mutations with potentially important phenotypic differences suggests that relying solely on amino acid-based gene detection to predict resistance is unlikely to be sufficient. Finally, the inability to explain all resistance using existing knowledge highlights the importance of new target gene discovery.

fundingNational Institute for Health and Care Research, Wellcome, and UK Medical Research Council.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliGenetic VariationCross-Sectional StudiesEscherichia coli InfectionsGenotypeHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNorwaySwedenThailandUnited KingdomAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID39378891
PMCPMC7617469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.