Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39378859›Full record

ArticleDermatology (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Three-Dimensional Total Body Photography, Digital Dermoscopy, and in vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy for Follow-Up Assessments of High-Risk Patients for Melanoma: A Prospective, Controlled Study.

Sarah Hobelsberger, Julian Steininger, Friedegund Elke Meier, Stefan Beissert, Frank Friedrich Gellrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Unique Features of Melanoma Risk and Diagnosis in Red-Haired Populations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah HobelsbergerDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Julian SteiningerDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Friedegund Elke MeierDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Stefan BeissertDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Frank Friedrich GellrichDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe combination of total body photography (TBP) and digital dermoscopy (DD) for monitoring patients with a high risk for melanoma can allow early detection of melanoma. This study aimed to examine if the use of three-dimensional (3D)-TBP, DD, and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) for regular monitoring of patients at high risk for melanoma was beneficial in comparison to monitoring using dermoscopy alone.

methodsThe intervention group (IG) underwent 3D-TBP examinations at every visit, along with DD and/or RCM for diagnosis and/or monitoring of pigmented lesions if necessary. The control group (CG) underwent dermoscopy examinations alone.

resultsA total of 600 patients (324 male and 276 female) were followed up over a median period of 23 months (mean, 2.85 visits) in the IG and 22 months (mean, 2.74 visits) in the CG (p = 0.009). DD and RCM monitoring were performed for 166 and 105 lesions, respectively. The number needed to treat (NNT) to diagnose melanoma with RCM was 2.83. The IG included more second primary melanomas (22 vs. 1, p = 0.022) and more excised nevi (186 vs. 10, p < 0.001), which consisted of more dysplastic nevi (137 vs. 2, p < 0.001). Among the melanomas diagnosed in the IG, three were diagnosed directly with RCM, nine with a combination of 3D-TBP and RCM, and 10 with dermoscopy alone.

conclusionFollow-up assessments with a combination of 3D-TBP, DD, and RCM led to the detection of more melanomas in comparison to the CG. The use of RCM reduced the NNT for melanocytic lesions.

Indexed as

DermoscopyMelanomaMicroscopy, ConfocalPhotographySkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesConfocal microscopyDermoscopyImaging methodMelanomaNevusNoninvasive diagnosisTotal body photography

Identifiers

PMID39378859
PMCPMC11651331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.